Archive for the ‘One People’s Public Trust (OPPT)’ Category

Posted from:

Paradoxman316 YouTube Channel

Published on Apr 6, 2014

It is my belief that no sane person thinks the current system of finance is sustainable. We’ve been told that even those who have been running it for so long want to crash it. For them, it is problem, reaction, solution. They want to crash the system so that they can implement tighter controls on humanity and bring their dark new world order into being. The problem is, people are waking up, making that scenario more difficult if not impossible. There are those visionaries, seeing the inevitability of collapse, that have created alternative systems, like Bitcoin and Equi, to name two. Frankly, I don’t see how these have a chance to succeed on a worldwide level. SWISSINDO, on the other hand, along with the BRICS nations, have proposed a basket of currencies backed by collateral assets: gold, silver, platinum, etc. To me, these provide a bridge to get from where we are to where we are going, which, I believe, will eventually be a money-less society.



Posted from:


I AM Without Prejudice: ALL that is needed

Many conversations are circling in groups online and in person over the use of signatures.   As I have pointed out over the past few days, “They” need your signature to take your value. “They” cannot touch your value even with a 10 foot pole without that scribble that is your signature…. hence they will do ANYTHING to get your signature onto a document.

Everything you sign, from here on out, should include the words “Without Prejudice”.  For me, it is now part of my signature on EVERYTHING.

One thing that Heather explained to me yesterday that makes absolute sense to me, is that anytime you are asked to fill out any form- whether you have to sign it or not- be sure to write the words “without prejudice” on the form somewhere visible.  For example: when you enter a country and they give you that little form to fill out with your name and where you are coming from and where you are going to etc…, even though there is no spot on the form for your signature, you should still write on the form “without prejudice”, with or without your signature. That will nullify any agreement that they are trying to force upon you with the use of that form.

…. I wish I’d known that BEFORE we landed in Morocco, lol, but now I kNOW it.

Funnily enough, the inclusion of those words “without prejudice” and/or I AM, has a very physical effect on those reading it from an official position.  Almost like a cautionary note.  When we were renewing our passports in Malta, our first meeting with the Canadian Consulate Aide was very different than our second meeting, in which he had seen our paperwork and my signature that included “without prejudice”.  The second meeting he was very polite and very ….. helpful.  The same with our dealings with the Canadian Embassy in Rome.  The first few emailed conversations were very … condescending from the Embassy staff, but after receiving our paperwork (with multiple without prejudice signatures), suddenly they were very careful about how they dealt with us.  This is because when anyone from an official position sees that signature, they KNOW that you KNOW.

When you sign anything with without prejudice and I AM, you are completely nullifying any control and any contract that any person, group, corporation or “government” tries to place upon you.  They MUST accept your signature legally as anything you want it to be.

…. and it IS rather fun to watch their faces when they see it!

OH! and as if to drive this point about signatures home, I received this skype message this morning from the lovely Bea and Howard:


[2:12:48 AM] Just  Bea : D, I MUST share this with you because Howard and I haven’t stopped laughing!!!”Questions for St. Germain through Elizabeth Trutwin, St Germain’s Answers are in Bold

Eric Darnell I have a desire to create Joy Creation Devices and Centers, with the full intention of the highest good of all concerned and raising the resonance. Is this something I could obtain funding for? Thanks be to you dear one.
18 hours ago · Unlike · 2

Each Soul on Earth has been given their war reparations in the amount of $10,000,000.00 This does not include the criminals. Some will receive nothing. Those who have prepared themselves and are ready to go with everything in place will receive more intended to go towards humanitarian work. When One signs for what they are to receive they will be required to sign a non disclosure agreement. No one will know what others received. It has to be this way.” (rofl);((rofl) (where is the “peeing my pants from laughing” emoticon?)

… So apparently it isn’t just the banks and the governments and Swissindo that needs your signature- even “St Germaine” needs it too.

Interesting, eh?

With Love, Without Prejudice,


In love, peace and gratitude, with the full responsibility and liability of I AM:


KEYSof I AM, hidden “in plain sight” within the “former systems” by I AM:
                             ~ I AM
….it is that simple ;)=98….I AM takes care of“the rest”…all ways, always. ~ I AM
I AM: The “former systems” I AM were pre-frequencied by I AM to respond to The Will and The Word of             I AM and the original currency I AM~ I AM
DO you recognize each of the “former system” functions reconciled in pure love within the above I AM Documents…? In pure love and original currency…I AM.  Wait ’till you see the affect…LOL!!!
If ONE has identified Value within numerous depositories, and decides to transfer or reconfigure the identified Value within ONE’s own depositories…are functions of the “former systems” even applicable?  …hhhhhmmmmmmm? ;)=98 
WITHOUT PREJUDICE: The “former systems” I AM were pre-frequencied by I AM to respond to     
                                              the signature of I AM without prejudice ~ I AM

Howard Freeman did a beautiful explanation of “without prejudice” during the era of the UCC: When you see ‘Without Prejudice’ UCC 1-308 in connection with your signature, you are saying: ‘I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract, commercial agreement or bankruptcy that I did not enter knowingly , voluntarily , and intentionally . And furthermore, I do not and will not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement or bankruptcy.’”  ~ absolute context can be found here.  (Oh my gosh!  I am getting so much better at this website thing!!!  I just did like Dani does!!!  Btw, Love, did you know that “Ego” is Latin for I AM?….Seriously! Tee hee!  Ok…focus now!)

The numerous investigations of the “former systems” done around the globe are filled with many funny, and not funny, stories of the “without prejudice”.  As I was wrapping up the last case of the investigations and readying to go to Morocco and then on to Europe, a sheriff put his hand on his gun hoping it would stop me or influence me not to write my signature “without prejudice Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf”….I signed with my signature while explaining to the (court bailiff), Audrey, and the judge that a signature is mark or writing I intend to use to authenticate the document….the next (court hearing) the sheriff was not present and Audrey handed me the document and told me to sign any way that I chose….I giggled and asked her “so someone talked to you about that law? I notice the sheriff and his gun aren’t here…” She giggled and winked. (I AM gives a “shout out” to Jack Nevin and the boys at the Pentagon!  I loved DO’ing the Absolute Plan!!)

For more absolute context, you can read here or here, or better yet….”google it!” (See Dani! I did it again! LOL!!):  “Signatures also form the legal basis of negotiable instruments. Section 3-401(2) of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) provides that “[n]o person is liable on an instrument unless his signature appears thereon.” The UCC defines the term signature as any name, Trade Name, assumed name, word, or other identifying mark used in lieu of a signature (§ 3-401(2)). The term signed is defined by the UCC as any symbol executed or adopted by a party with the “present intention of authenticating a writing” (§ 1-201(39)). Thus, commercial instruments, such as checks and promissory notes, may be signed by affixing any symbol that an individual intends to represent his signature. Consequently, courts will enforce commercial contracts signed with an X without regard to an individual’s mental or physical ability to sign her full name, though mental or physical incapacity may be relevant if a particular contract is alleged to be the product of overreaching, Undue Influence, or coercion.”

NOW, in the era of IS, I AM without prejudice, gets real fun:  Regardless of any particular inbodyment’s “reaction” to an inbodyment of I AM signing “without prejudice, I AM, [enter given name]“, I AM does the rest….and all the inbodyments I AM, visibly know and experience I AM, in absolute context.  For the Apa Gnosis example in the I AM Documents, above, we also lawfully and intentionally created an application for using the “former system” bank application, without prejudice, for devices (The Value is I AM, BE’ing and DO’ing…and devices can be used in that BE’ing and DO’ing for as long as devices exist….but they are only devices. All devices, regardless of the identity of the device is always 1 unit…10,000USD is 10,000 units of device, 10,000Euro is 10,000 units of another device, 10,000Yen is 10,000 units of yet another device, and so on…). 

Posted from:

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room


Posted By: igots2no [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 14-Dec-2013 08:59:07

David P. Crayford writes:



Since Karen Hudes came on the scene talking about the GREEN HILTON AGREEMENT I have been inundated with mails from all over the world, on a constant basis requesting if I can explain what is the meaning of this AGREEMENT and why is it that Hudes, Keenan, Scott, and Wilcock are all talking about it.

I have been unable to answer all the emails because I am semi-retired and need my relaxation time, so I hope that those people whose mails have not yet been answered will forgive me in responding via RMN and Abundanthope.

The “GREEN HILTON AGREEMENT” was an agreement, not an International Treaty or Bi-lateral Treaty. The actual AGREEMENT was entered into on the Indonesian side by Mr Soewarno (Code Name – Satya Darma), Mr Chaerul Pathollah (Code Name – Suring Pati), and Ms Sarinah (Code Name – Lady of Roses) all working under a Power of Attorney issued by President Soekarno. This AGREEMENT dated 14th November 1963 was countersigned by President Soekarno on 21st February 1966.

On the American side the AGREEMENT was entered into by President John F. Kennedy, Mr Hughes Scoot, Mr Robert Huglis, Mr Anthong Brian.

Within the actual document it states, quote “And, if it is necessary to change Ownership name of the Ownership Receipt, then this Treaty the Ownership is illegal and improper according to the current law”.

There is in fact two parts to this AGREEMENT. One being the actual “AGREEMENT – GREEN HILTON MEMORIAL BUILDING GENEVE AND CERTIFICATE OF GENEVE”, the other part being the “MASTER AGREEMENT” dated October 7th 1961.

It matters not who executed this AGREEMENT, or both parts of this AGREEMENT, nor does it really matter what the dates are. What really matters is whether it is legal and whether the signatories to the AGREEMENT are legally authorised to execute such an AGREEMENT.

Let me start with the latter of the above paragraph. The main point here is that President Soekarno was only the Holder or Custodian and held no power under the Custodianship agreements entered into some years previously; to delegate power of authority to any person or party. Soekarno himself, did not hold any power of signatory rights to transfer, assign, sell, dispose, or otherwise any of the Gold or other assets under his Custodianship. He claimed the power under the fact that the original ownership documents had disappeared, or were lost. Such documents of ownership were not lost nor had they disappeared. They were, like all other documents to such physical assets, held separate from the physical assets in depositories elsewhere in the world. Those documents of ownership are still held within a separate depository some thousands of miles away from the Swiss depositories where the Gold is held.
Soekarno was not even the person known as M1, that position was held by President Marcos of the Philippines, so Soekarno held no power whatsoever other than Holder or Custodian with exceptionally limited power. Yet he wrongly claimed ownership rights on assets that he did not own.

In respect of the America persons / parties who executed both parts of this AGREEMENT, they were nominated following the Presidential Executive Order issued by President John F. Kennedy, which ultimately led to the “AGREEMENT – GREEN HILTON MEMORIAL BUILDING GENEVE AND CERTIFICATE OF GENEVE” dated 14th November 1963 and finally countersigned by President Soekarno on 21st February 1966, the other part being the “MASTER AGREEMENT” dated October 7th 1961.

The question now is whether the execution of this AGREEMENT was legal, irrespective of who executed it on the American side.

Following President John F. Kennedy’s assassination in November 1963, President Lyndon Johnson was sworn in as President within the hotel where he was staying in Houston, Texas. The very first act of President Lyndon Johnson, again whilst he was still within the hotel in Houston, Texas, was to revoke the Presidential Executive Order issued by President Kennedy, which was the Executive Order that led to the “AGREEMENT – GREEN HILTON MEMORIAL BUILDING GENEVE AND CERTIFICATE OF GENEVE” and the “MASTER AGREEMENT”. As a result of this revocation the “AGREEMENT – GREEN HILTON MEMORIAL BUILDING GENEVE AND CERTIFICATE OF GENEVE” and the “MASTER AGREEMENT” became null and void.

To further confirm the Null and Void factor of this AGREEMENT, and this is something that not many people are aware of, is the fact that the 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 Dollar Bills had already been printed. The latter Bills were coming to the end of the printing run.
The 1 and 2 Dollar Bills had been placed into circulation. The 5, 10, and 20 Dollar Bills were ready to place into circulation.

Upon the revocation of the Executive Order issued by President Kennedy, by President Johnson, the 1 and 2 Dollar Bills already in circulation were withdrawn from the market place in their entirety. The 5, 10, and 20 Dollar Bills were never placed into circulation, as applied to the 50 and 100 Dollar Bills when the printing run had ceased. All these Notes, except for a few which were held by collectors, were destroyed.

The “AGREEMENT – GREEN HILTON MEMORIAL BUILDING GENEVE AND CERTIFICATE OF GENEVE” and the “MASTER AGREEMENT” being null and void, were never recognised by the United States, nor was it ever recorded and registered as a legitimate, enforceable, and legally binding document between two countries.

Now we have a situation that America is claiming this “AGREEMENT – GREEN HILTON MEMORIAL BUILDING GENEVE AND CERTIFICATE OF GENEVE” and the “MASTER AGREEMENT” is legal and is relative to who owns the Gold which was the collateral to be used behind this AGREEMENT. It was never used and remains under the ownership of the Trust, which in itself is a Trust held under Foundation Divine / Collateral Accounts, which is / are owned by the International Treasury Controller, as Legal Heir, Owner, and Sole Arbiter as appointed by the Nations of the World (being those empowered to appoint) on January 20th 1995.

The aforementioned appointment was made to replaced the Trilateral Trillenium Tripartite Gold Commission (America, France, United Kingdom) who had committed so much fraud within their Fifty (50) year term, the Nations of the World agreed that this term should not be extended or renewed. Instead they appointed one person to legally own, control and arbitrate all assets held under Foundation Divine / Collateral Accounts and the numerous Trusts and Foundations owned by Foundation Divine.

The main point here is that with wrongful claimed ownership of the Gold, and the revocation of the Executive Order issued by President Kennedy, the “AGREEMENT – GREEN HILTON MEMORIAL BUILDING GENEVE AND CERTIFICATE OF GENEVE” and the “MASTER AGREEMENT” is not valid, and never has been recognised as a legitimate enforceable AGREEMENT, either internationally or between two countries, and therefore it holds no legal standing and is totally unenforceable in law. This is a point endorsed by the Indonesia side of the AGREEMENT wherein it states “ “And, if it is necessary to change Ownership name of the Ownership Receipt, then this Treaty the Ownership is illegal and improper according to the current law”.

I really have to ask therefore why is America, or at least Hudes, Keenan, Wilcock and Scott continuing to hinge on an AGREEMENT that does not legally exist.

America have tried everything else in the book in an attempt to claim all these assets, including theft on a grand scale, and still the real legal documentation denies them, but they are still trying, along with their additional misinformation operators, to claim ownership. In addition to this they are constantly debunking the International Treasury Controller as a fraudulent operation which of course it isn’t as it is an internationally recognised Agreement of Appointment executed by those who were empowered to execute.

On a separate, but related issue, Wolfgang Struck is NOT, I repeat NOT, the signatory to these accounts, and never has been. He probably holds an illegal document of Power of Attorney or Mandate giving him that so-called and claimed legal right, but executed by Holders / Custodians who have no power whatsoever as Holders / Custodians, as was the same situation with Soekarno; there is no legal right to assign, transfer, sell, dispose, or similar.

So again, an illegal act in an attempt to gain control over the assets of the Collateral Accounts, for whatever reason, which, having seen (and now on our records) some of the illicit agreements that surround their unlawful activities, and that includes illicit and unlawful agreements issued and executed by the World Bank, only about 10% is allocated to the world. The rest simply goes into their pockets. To hell with the people, it’s us first and they can have the leftovers, is their policy.

In simple terms, you have a substantial cash deposit account in a bank. A Third Party comes along and decides he / she will use your cash deposit account and the balance thereof, without your knowledge, as collateral to enable a Fourth Party to issued some Bonds, or certificates. Whoa boy, not legally possible and you would soon be on your bank’s doorstep if something like this was attempted ……….. WOULDN’T YOU. I would and I believe most people in this world would be exactly the same. That’s how simple this is, in a Nutshell, despite all the claims of Agreements / Treaties, assassinations, false claims, misinformation, or similar.

Finally, this leads to the RESPECTING THE RIGHTS TREATY executed in Bangkok 2003. It is an illicit Treaty derived from nothing because the “AGREEMENT – GREEN HILTON MEMORIAL BUILDING GENEVE AND CERTIFICATE OF GENEVE” and the “MASTER AGREEMENT” is not, and never has been recognised as a legitimate enforceable AGREEMENT, either internationally or between two countries, and therefore it holds no legal standing and is totally unenforceable in law.

Furthermore, it was initiated by a person on the Indonesia side, along with his lawyers, who do not hold any legal right, and who is neither a Holder / Custodian / Signatory, but claims he is the legitimate son and heir of President Soekarno.

There are very few people in this world who have access to “Top Secret” documents / archives, of which Keenan, Hudes, Wilcock, Scott are not included in that list, yet they profess and promulgate their extensive and unquestionable knowledge on such matters. I would rather believe in fairies than listen to their diatribe.


David P. Crayford.

Posted from:
AbsoluteBaloney YouTube Channel

Uploaded on Jan 26, 2011 for more on ufos..The Day Before Disclosure is a film documenting the growing awareness and the build up to what can potentially be the single, most important event in human history — the day the UFO and ET presence becomes a world wide accepted reality.

This is the story of the witnesses that was laughed at, the researchers and reporters that wasn’t believed and the governmental and military personnel that were sworn to silence. A story that alters the foundation of everything you thought you knew, and takes you along for a ride all the way from the darkest abyss of living nightmares, through to the brightest hope for the future of humanity.

This is the greatest story in human history.

This upload is intended as educational and non profit. All credits, read further:


Steven Greer
Edgar Mitchell
Steve Basset
Robert Dean
Budd Hopkins
Barbara Lamb
David Jacobs
Richard Dolan
Stanton Friedman
Peter Robbins
Jim Marrs
Nadine Lalich
Michael Salla
Milton Torres
Wendelle Stevens
Paola Harris
Nick Pope
Miriam Delicado
Linda Moulton Howe
Robert Hastings
Dr Roger Leir

Company: New Paradigm Films
Director: Terje Toftenes
Producer: Truls Toftenes, Ragnhild Løken, Terje Toftenes
Music: Rover

Posted from:

I’ve said for awhile now that the alleged whistle blower Karen Hudes is nothing of the sort. I found this article on RMN where a guy named David Crayford (have no clue of who he is) has written in response to the Karen Hudes operation! I found this article very interesting and I would say right on the money.  There is tons of disinformation and misinformation about the collateral accounts the RV-Revaluation , PPP-Private Placement Programs, GCR-Global Currency Resets etc etc.!

SWISSINDO is for instance referring to the Green Hilton Memorial Agreement between Kennedy and Mr Soekarno here you see another story. Who is wrong and who is right does not matter much but I think it adds to the puzzle getting more and more complete!  Find below the article from RMN. ~OT

From The Rumor Mill News Reading Room:
In Response To: The Karen Hudes Operation (igots2no)

“Dear Dimce,

Ref: to the article as referred below, which needs further input.

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
The Karen Hudes Operation
Posted By: igots2no [Send E-Mail]Date: Monday, 24-Mar-2014 21:48:02

I have just finished reading the article (as referenced above) on RMN and the website and feel compelled to respond to this because once again, it gives a small part of the story, sufficient to mislead people, but it doesn’t give the whole part of the story which shows a completely different picture.

Allow me to start with the uncut US Dollar Notes. These are NOT the normal US Dollar Notes currently in circulation, referred by many as Federal Reserve Notes. They are in fact the “Reagan Dollars” or otherwise known as the “Asian Dollar”. These were printed in the Philippines and China for a purpose which is a “Common Currency” for the whole of the South East Asia Region (Ten (10) countries to be precise). In fact there were Trillions of these Dollar Notes printed which are all mainly in storage in China, but there are some in the Philippines, as well as within UBS (The European Agent for the Federal Reserve). China have been attempting to do a deal with the Americans on these Notes based upon a 50/50 basis.

This “Common Currency” was supposed to have been initiated in 1998 but it all collapsed because the 10 Asian countries involved rejected it because they did not desire to be controlled by the Federal Reserve. Introduction of this currency was then rescheduled for 2004 but again it collapsed because the 10 countries rejected it.

This is what all the arguments are partially about re: Thaksin Shinawatra (Former P.M. Of Thailand, convicted criminal and fugitive from justice) and his Sister (the current Prime Minister of Thailand). The fact is they are working very closely with the Americans, along with other leaders of some of the Asian countries involved, reference to the introduction of the Asian Dollar.
With reference to the Gold backing for this currency, there are three vitally important issues here which will open people’s eyes and allow them to understand these things better:-

A). Although Marcos executed this agreement with Ronald Reagan, he later pulled out of the agreement and rescinded same, because he had established what the Americans were really trying to do, and it certainly was not for Humanitarian purposes as indicated within the agreement. It was for political purposes combined with a common currency controlled by the Federal Reserve.

Total control over the the 10 Asian countries achieved by devious means.
Americans had under-mined Marcos reference to the ABL currency (a Common Currency for the 10 countries of South East Asia which was Gold Backed) which the 10 countries had previously agreed to under International Treaty (Note: I have those Treaties on record).
Now you know some of the reasons why Marcos, in the eyes of America, had to go. Haven’t we all seen similar instances in the more recent years.

B). The second vital point here is that Marcos withdrew the Gold he had previously agreed to reference / allocate to the aforesaid agreement. Therefore this “Reagan Dollar” or other referred to as the “Asian Dollar” is just “Fiat” currency with no real value, and certainly hasn’t got any Gold backing it.

C). The third point is equally important, and probably the most important. That is the January 1995 Treaty agreements executed by the Nations of the World which appointed a Legal Heir to Decadency, a legal Owner, Sole Arbiter, and Controller, of the Combined International Collateral Accounts of the Global Debt Facility, otherwise known as the Collateral Accounts, Global Accounts, Global Debt Facility. That person was Dr. Ray C. Dam, the former Gold Signatory to the G7, and just like Marcos, Ray Dam had to go.

These 1995 agreements and the content thereof, superseded all other previous agreements entered into by the Americans with any Holder, Custodian, Signatory, etc of the Collateral Accounts, prior to 1995, and there are many of them, all of which are voided, invalidated, and legally unenforceable.

This being the real situation, then that agreement executed by Marcos and Reagan as shown within the said article / report, is legally void, is now invalid, and legally unenforceable. So in simple terms, it means nothing and holds no legal substance whatsoever.

The real question now is who is trying to mislead the public into believing something which legally no longer is valid and has no meaning whatsoever.

Let me now attend to specific and important issues in reference to the article written by J C Collins within the aforementioned web article:-

i). I have to agree with J C Collins’s comments, quote “it is my contention that she is the lead figure in a psychological operation meant to distract away from real events and processes happening in the world”.
Karen Hudes has proven nothing yet, other than having a small amount of information which she believes is the whole picture, followed by the constant repetitiveness of her interviews and the deviation to other subjects within her comments.

ii). The statement, quote “The truth that your blog is evading has to do with the source of financing for the Ukrainian revolt and whether it was fomented by nonindigenous forces”.
The real truth of the matter is that the Ukrainian situation was unlawfully financed by the Collateral Accounts through unlawful use of assets of the Collateral Accounts by the Federal Reserve within an illicit “Trading” program. It is all part of their “One World Currency” Doctrine propagated by America and its Allies.

iii). The statement, quote “My original sources, cloaked in illegal secrecy, are impeccable. I challenge you to inform your readers by publishing them:”
If your sources are “Cloaked in illegal secrecy”then why are you condoning such illegal secrecy by a). Stating same, and b). Requesting that J.C. Collins publish them??????

iv). The statement, quote “I simply cited the Green Hilton Agreement so that people would know what John F. Kennedy was doing that caused the Jesuits to murder him. David Crayford is deliberately trying to undermine me by attributing to me positions that I do not hold. This is what is known as a “straw man” argument. I never said that the Green Hilton Agreement was now in force and effect”.

You keep quoting the “Green Hilton Agreement” even after I have advised that it is legally invalid and unenforceable, WHY ????????? Why do you keep quoting “The Green Hilton Agreement” when you now openly state, quote “I never said that the Green Hilton Agreement was now in force and effect”. You must have a belief that it is in legal effect and enforceable, hence why you keep quoting it, so you are in fact contradicting yourself Ms Hudes.

I am trying to undermine you am I, by attributing to you positions that you do not hold. You stated yourself that after your dismissal from the World Bank, you were reinstated, so I only attributed to you your last position as you have publicly stated.

In fact Ms Hudes, you have undermined yourself in many ways because you really do not know what you are talking about. It doesn’t need me to undermine you at all, why, because eventually all misinformation agents run out of steam and start repeating themselves or changing the subject. You have totally undermined yourself, but typical, you, like all others, have to shift the blame onto someone else. Don’t blame me for your own misgivings Ms. Hudes.

v). The statement, quote “And who is David Crayford”?
I am the official spokesperson for the ITC / OITC, that is who. The ITC being the Legal Heir, Owner, Sole Arbiter, and Controller of the Combined International Collateral Accounts of the Global Debt Facility, otherwise referred to as the Collateral Accounts, the Global Accounts, the Global Debt Facility.

vi). The statement, quote “The legal authority for the issuance of the uncut dollars that John F. Kennedy printed comes from the Bilateral Agreement, (see paragraph 6, giving the World Bank and IMF legal authority over the Collateral Account.)

Boy, oh boy, someone really has got their lines crossed here. Quote “that John F. Kennedy printed” What BS. These were authorized under Reagan not Kennedy, even the agreement was signed by Reagan not Kennedy, whereby there were to be the new “Asian Dollar”, otherwise known as the “Reagan Dollar”, the common currency of the 10 South East Asian countries which was rejected by said countries because they did not desire to be controlled by the Federal Reserve. For information purposes there is a period of 18 years and 59 days between the Presidency of JFK and that of R Reagan.

As for the, quote “comes from the Bilateral Agreement, (see paragraph 6, giving the World Bank and IMF legal authority over the Collateral Account.)”.

Ferdinand Marcos withdrew from that agreement when he released what the Americans were up to, so the agreement is void and has no legal basis nor is it enforceable at any times. This Bilateral Agreement, whether considered legal by one Nation, or otherwise, was superseded by the January 1995 Treaty agreements between the Nations of the World. These agreements were also based upon the 1976 agreements, the 1980 agreements, and of course the 1995 agreements, and now the May 2012 agreements.

The World Bank and IMF, DO NOT have Legal Authority over the Collateral Accounts. That is where the World Bank and IMF are committing fraud because they claim something which they have no legal right to claim and there are no legal agreements in force to substantiate their claim.

There is another issue here Ms Hudes, that being that at the time you were Senior Legal Counsel to the World Bank so you must be aware of the illegality of these agreements you refer to. At the same time you must also be aware of many other illegal agreements initiated by the World Bank reference to the Collateral Accounts. You may have also been a signatory to some of the agreements, if not externally, then internally, which makes you complicit in fraud against the Collateral Accounts, Ms Hudes.

vii). The statement, quote “I have been reinstated by the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF as the Acting General Counsel of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.”.

Am I wrong in stating that the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development is the former name for the World Bank. Research shows, quote “Established in 1944 as the original institution of the World Bank Group”, and quote “It was established in 1944 with the mission of financing the reconstruction of European nations devastated by World War II.

Together, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and its concessional lending arm, the International Development Association, are collectively known as the World Bank as they share the same leadership and staff”. In fact it is the very same organization Ms Hudes. If I am correct, what game are you playing here Ms Hudes.

ix). The statement, quote “The Board of Governors of the World Bank has authorized the release of the uncut US dollars from Union Bank of Switzerland in accordance with the instructions of the authorized signatory, Wolfgang Struck. The banking cartel is illegally refusing to release the uncut US dollars printed by John F. Kennedy. Instead, the banking cartel wants to engineer the collapse of the US dollar.”

Neither the Board of Governors, the World Bank, or Union Bank of Switzerland (Proper name is United Bank of Switzerland based upon when they were taken over by SBC some years ago. They still like to use the words Union Bank because people have short memories and publicly it appears to be the same bank, when in reality it isn’t); hold any authority over the “uncut dollars”.

You will find that because of the various agreements regarding these “Uncut Dollars” and International Treaties, these “Uncut Dollars” were transferred to the Collateral Accounts so that they could not be used by the issuers at any time in the future.

Wolfgang Struck is NOT THE AUTHORISED SIGNATORY as is claimed, and that can be proven legally.

Why is the banking cartel refusing to release the “Uncut Dollars” ………. Probably because they know the truth and with many already facing severe financial penalties and possibly later, fraud charges, they are being ultra careful not in involve themselves with persons who are not who they claim to be, Ms. Hudes.

x). The statement, quote “You should follow me on Twitter, @KarenHudes as I will have nothing further to do with Rumor Mill News. David Crayford deliberately removed the thread of links that would have enabled his readers to understand my information”.

Now you are trying to blame me for something I have absolutely no control over, Ms. Hudes. How cheap, foolish, and very low in character you are making yourself look Ms. Hudes.
The issue of whether an article is published or not by RMN is entirely at the discretion of the Administrators of that site, Ms. Hudes, not me.

I have no legal or financial connection to RMN at all, so I have no control over anything they do or say.
Get your facts right Ms. Hudes and stop misinforming people with your gossip.

A lot of whatever you say Ms. Hudes is mere speculation and supposition. Whether you care to believe it or not, I am, not only a lawyer but more of an authority on the subject of the Collateral Accounts than what you will ever believe.

In my opinion, you are a misinformation agent, putting out an awful amount of BS for the people to believe, when in fact they should be rejecting and discarding it. We attempted to inform you of various factors that are all verifiable, but you even refused to accept our envelope that was delivered to you, because you did not want to involve yourself with “Top Secret” matters.

All I can say Ms. Hudes, is in that case, do not get involved with the Collateral Accounts and the fraudulent goings on at the World Bank and the IMF, because this is a “Top Secret” matter and no one will ever get to the truth unless they hold one of the highest International security level classification ratings, which normally is held only by Kings, Queens, Presidents, and Prime Ministers as well as the International Treasury Controller, and NO, Ms. Hudes, we are NOT cabal and do not adhere to the cabal’s policies, or the One World Order.

We are a “SOVEREIGN ENTITY” completely independent from Politics (National or International) or religion, with our own jurisdiction, and one that stands above and beyond all other “Sovereign Nations”.

We don’t want you in the picture stirring up the muddy waters because you, like others, just impede our objectives and prevent us from doing our job ……….. Perhaps that is your purpose Ms. Hudes?????????????

David P. Crayford.”

The data coming out now is moving in warp speed!!! Here is some more information about the economic fraud taking place world wide with slush funds moved around in order to hide what is being done. The conversation continues with my friend D from RTS who talks to David Crayford. I think David is just another agent who does not see the big picture might be well intended but nevertheless. ~OT

D from RTS has comments for David Crayford

Posted By: igots2no [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 25-Mar-2014 22:21:08

In Response To: “And who is David Crayford”? I am the official spokesperson for the ITC / OITC, that is who (igots2no)

        D from RTS writes:

        Standing round of applause! While I do not agree with Crawford on many things, his outline in this article is WAY closer to the actual facts than the drivel that Hudes tried to sell to the public. The Reagan dollars ARE in China- there are literally vaults filled with pallets of this currency scam and they are completely useless and have 0 value at all. NOTHING that Reagan did was for the “betterment of man” nor “humanitarian” ….. The Wanta Reagan Mitterand accords/theft is a glaring tribute to that, along with the Marcos debacle.

        The ponzi scam “money” that financed the Ukraine’s protests (and syria etc) was not from the Collateral Accounts though- the accounts are locked down and even the two people who were the ONLY two who had access to the accounts, are now locked out. The money that has been used is part of the ridiculous make believe money shuffling and monetary slight of hand tricks which the Fed has been using for the past year to keep up the illusion that all is well in Economicland.

        As for the “Green Hilton Agreements” I have a copy of them myself and spent quite a bit of time searching for verification of their validity. I have found none, and have found no one that can provide ANY proof that they were even actually signed, let alone put into play.

        Hudes is STILL employed for the World Bank. That alone speaks louder than words- and by the very ommission of well known information that anyone in her position would possess- ie: what is the value, where it comes from, how money is created, the fact that all these governments are actually corporations who are controlled by the banksters…. she is proclaiming openly that she is a disinformationist.

        Right now, there is a HUGE web is misinformation and disinformation being spread across the internet and around the world. The idea is to give enough truth to get your attention… then spawn very believable lies to muddy the waters and distract from the actual truth and facts of what is going on. With anyone like Hudes, it’s more important to hear what she does NOT say, than to listen to what she IS saying. Take notice of the topics that she does NOT talk about, pay attention to the things that she tosses off as lies, but then hurries away to talk about something else entirely. This goes for anyone blowing the whistle from an official position.

        There is a LOT of truth coming out in the media right now- more than ever before, which is why I started Transpicuous News, to show the glaring transparency that is flooding out. All you need to do is pay attention to what is being said and not said…. it’s all right there in black and white.

        As I said, while I don’t agree with Crawford on a lot of things….. great article!!! Thank you!

        love D


David Crayford responds to D from RTS

Posted By: igots2no [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 26-Mar-2014 08:44:58

In Response To: D from RTS has comments for David Crayford (igots2no)

        David Crayford writes:

        I am pleased to see that someone other than the likes of Keenan, Hudes, Drake, Wilcock, Casper, and others, does not agree with many factors that I state. I welcome that as it leads to good open discussion and further understandings regarding a very complex subject.

        However, I would like to point out a couple of issues with Reader D’s comments.

        If I may just correct you on one issue. It is Crayford not Crawford, or in the case of Keenan who refers to me as Crayfish.

        The second issue is, quote “The ponzi scam “money” that financed the Ukraine’s protests (and syria etc) was not from the Collateral Accounts though- the accounts are locked down and even the two people who were the ONLY two who had access to the accounts, are now locked out”.

        We are fully aware that the accounts have been locked down. That is an effort to stop all the fraud that has existed for decades. However, and as I certainly would expect, the crooks have found a way around all of this. This is where you have misunderstood what I have previously written.
        One way is that the Federal Reserve have been trading Petchilli Bonds, Mexican Bonds, etc for a considerable time, building up a ‘slush Fund’ in conjunction with other crooks mainly the CIA and NSA. When this was realised this trading was blocked, but now they have moved onto the Kennedy Bonds and trading through the various International Banks.
        That too is now blocked and being locked down. The aforesaid ‘slush fund’ has yet to be located but it has been split into numerous accounts in various parts of the world under pseudonym names, so it will take time to locate all of it. In the meantime they are using these funds for financing covert operations which does include the Ukrainian situation. I did briefly explain this in my previous article by stating the words ‘by the Federal Reserve within an illicit “Trading” program’.

        A second factor is that we are aware that a Signatory of an account, which is not the original signatory but a former NSA/CIA employee who was deliberately and purposely placed into the Signatory position of one of the Trusts, so that access for illicit activities could take place quite easily. That person gave the access and other codes to Prince Bandar (This happened before the ‘Lock down’ of the accounts) who accessed the Federal Reserve ‘Blue Screens’ and immediately removed $32 billion US Dollars. By following the money trail, this money, or a large part of it, was used to finance insurgency in Syria. Prince Bandar, or the Saudi Royal Family, will now have to pay this $32 billion back, whether they like it or not.

        That is all I need to say to Reader D, other than Thank You for your comments.


Reply to David Crayford from D of RTS

Posted By: hobie [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 26-Mar-2014 18:27:16

In Response To: David Crayford responds to D from RTS (igots2no)

        (Thanks, D. :)

        Reader D. of RemovingTheShackles replies:


        Hi David- Sorry about misspelling your name!

        As for the Collateral accounts. Actually the money didn’t come from the accounts- because they are locked down…. BUT…. what the lovely money digger thieves did was to mirror the accounts, using them as…. “collateral”, lol! When they discovered in late 2012 that even the signatories could not access the biometric security systems, they created a sort of ETF to Mirror the accounts, and claimed the funds that are locked down as collateral for the money they magically created through the ETF Mirror. Nice eh? I think that you’ll find that the “slush fund” you are looking for is the mirrored ETF that, if I remember correctly, was run through UBS.

        Before the security system locked out the two signatories in 2012, they- the thieves- use to access the accounts by quasi kidnapping the two of them, having them open the accounts and then dropping them off back home while they money thieves ran off with the “dough”.

        And yes it IS good to have these conversations and to pull all this info out into the publics awareness…. this is how people SEE the incredible fraud that has been going on.



As a side note, Heather and Bill and I did a lot of research into the ETFs a while ago.  Bill posted this into one of the skype rooms:

[3/26/2014 8:35:43 PM] ��  AK ��: Exchange traded funds are mirror accounts by definition. For example an ETF of the SP500 mirrors the SP500 index. ETFs are created by firms like Goldman Sachs, and they buy the underlying stock and create a mirror in the ETF called a “CREATION UNIT” there is supposed to be a 1-to-1 correspondence in these but its not closely regulated, its just assumed something real backs the ETF.   Heather, D and I were researching these a few months back and we thought perhaps that was how they were now hiding the birth certificate bonds, in ETFs, it severs the accounting trail to the underlying security by laundering it thru the “creation unit”…

[3/26/2014 8:36:25 PM] ��  AK ��: I think its also a way in a pinch to nab the underlying asset while crashing the ETF funds…

I strongly suspect that THIS is how they managed to keep the broken system going for a little while longer- by mirroring funds and using the original’s as collateral.  But now even that isn’t working for them any more because you still have to have investors to buy into the ETFs and be able to convince them that these “investments” are a great way to make a profit.   Unfortunately for the PTW, the investors are no longer playing that game- they have been burned far too many times to just accept something at face value now.    The newest rage is  “SHOW ME THE MONEY!!”

…. and when no one can show them the money….. well, it’s starting to make all these “investors” just a weeeeee bit leery.  The MSM can talk the talk about “economic recovery” and all this crap to th egeneral public, but the financial circles and groups are smarter than your average bear, and they KNOW the real deal is dead.


Thank you D for your analysis.  I appreciate the view because I believe it is something that exist in the minds of every One of Us.  I Am just wondering if a multiple-front approach (minus the bad guys or hearts are changed) of abundance would be a beautiful way to change the paradigm to One of Love.  The entire Earth, all Peoples and all systems just flowing with  abundance for the people and a realization that money is just a tool for good to those who walk in the light.  May that Light be each One of You!

– Angel


Posted from:


Alphabet Soup: SI, OPPT, RV, PPP, GCR….. without prejudice

After last night’s post “What if: The Tattered Ball of Twine”, I put the computer away for the night and had a (relatively) early night.  I awoke this morning to several people sending me the latest Zap and the latest SwissIndo video.

On the topic of the SwissIndo video that was 2 hours long (and I fully and transparently admit that I did NOT listen to the whole thing), at the 1:13 mark, the speaker discusses SwissIndo and OPPT, and once again I feel the need to clarify facts and to point out mis/disinformation.  The speaker that  describes the purported link between the SI and OPPT- from his perspective, and I suspect the perspective of SI leaders- is unfortunately misinformed and seems to misunderstand the OPPT filings, what exactly was the One People’s Public Trust, the basic content of the filings, the true understanding of the “Value” that is returned to the people of the planet, where the “Value” was “deposited”, what the reconciliation of the One People’s Public Trust is and why it was done, and the basic laws behind rebutting a UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) filing.

I will give just a brief review of a few of the points above.

The content of the OPPT UCC filings (which can be read in the original pdf format at the top of this page) has been fully and in complete transparency discussed in a multitude of articles, interviews and on many many radio shows over the past year.  I am not going to go over all of the details as the details are available to the public on many sites and recordings.

The “VALUE” of the people is Not money.  The Value of the people IS Energy, and IS the basis of the slavery system that has been used as a “financial system” for eons. The Slavery system equated that true VALUE/ENERGY into their financial tool called “money”.

The “One People’s Public Trust”  is NOT a “trust fund”.  At no point was the “Value” of the people ever put into an OPPT trust “fund” or “account”.   The “VALUE” of the people was deposited back TO the people by the OPPT filings and was never held BY the OPPT trustees.

The OPPT UCC filings eliminated all hierarchy, and closed down and foreclosed on the  “slavery system”.  Anyone who is using these filings to work with organizations, corporations or perceived “governments” that were foreclosed BY the filings, is re-animating and resurrecting the former slavery financial system, by recognizing them as still being operational and as being valid.  NO organization, group, corporation, or person has Any control over the disbursement, allocation, or amount of the perceived “value” of any Being – be it in monetary or energetic form- nor any ability to take a Being’s Value or assign a monetary amount to or from any individual person, Unless each person signs over their Value contractually and gives full consent to that organization.

The OPPT was never “bankrupt” and was never a “fund” that could be bankrupted.  The OPPT was reconciled once it had done it’s job and finished what it was set out to do, as are ALL “Trusts” once they have served their purpose.

I hope this clarifies this information once and for all.

Now, onto this weeks “Zap/Poof” report.  I though it very interesting that both Zap and SI were brought to my attention this morning.  ZAPs full report can be read here on Rumor Mill News:

I am not going to copy the full content of his report here, but will address a few things that he says.


 I find it rather interesting that Zap is suddenly commenting on SI, especially in relation to my comments above and a few of his comments below:



Can we move some funds to another banking institution, i.e. a non-federal credit union leaving some funds in the access bank? Do we need to diversify and spread the funds into different baskets?


Yes, it will not matter where you keep it BECAUSE all of the Banks- largest to smallest- and credit unions and any other financial/banking corporation or institution are ALL controlled by the BIS and the Federal Reserve Banking Cartel.  I have discussed this thoroughly many times.  It doesn’t matter if your accounts are in Switzerland or Swaziland, America or Armenia. If the BIS, the IMF and all the Central Banks in the world (with the exception of Iran, North Korea and Cuba (although the later is now highly doubtful as they are being wined and dined by the European Union and European Central Bank)) are still being treated as the controllers of the Money, then the former systems of slavery are still in place and still under the control of the same Banker Kingpins. ie: NOTHING HAS CHANGED.

Pay very close attention to the next question and answer Zap gives:


Under Basel III will we be required in the US to give SS# to open our accounts?


Did I highlight the operative word of that sentence enough? 

The one thing that has been said over and over and over, by all the supposed RV “Gurus”, by all these purported insiders with info about the GCR (Global Currency Revaluation) and the perceived “New” financial system is that you will be forced to sign a Non-Disclosure Contract, and that if you exchange your currencies in a bank with ANY group and/or any special rate, and that if you get a prosperity package…. you will HAVE to SIGN a CONTRACT with that bank.

…. hmmmmmm, a contract eh?  Now why does that sound familiar?……

Oh right:  NO organization, group, corporation, or person has Any control over the disbursement, allocation, or amount of the perceived “value” of any Being – be it in monetary or energetic form- nor any ability to take a Being’s Value or assign a monetary amount to or from any individual person, Unless each person signs over their Value contractually and gives full consent to that organization.

How do they plan on getting around the whole issue of using Your ASSETS (ie: YOU) to back their “new” Asset Backed Financial System?  By convincing you to sign over your “value” to them.



And there you have it everyone- exactly what I have been saying for a year:  The Federal Reserve (ie: the banking mafia) are still around, and still in the “Distribution” business of “money”.  The UST is just another corporation being controlled by the banksters- along with the BIS and IMF which are also under their control.

( BTW: I have had absolutely NO hard confirmation that the “RV” has happened.)


China is even more bankrupt that the US is.  They are dead broke, just like every other corporation disguised as a government.  They supposedly have bough 80B in gold this year…… but then they also seem to have a gold smuggling problem with it going through Nepal into India!  China is so desperate that they even convinced Mexican Drug lords to smuggle shipments of illegal iron ore (with gold hidden inside) instead of cocaine!!  They bought JPMorgan Chase’s Gold vault, but then suddenly all the gold is supposedly gone…. to….?

As I have said, The entire financial system has completely collapsed- all that you are seeing right now is the chaotic running of a headless chicken.  The reason that they haven’t “pressed the RV button” is because no matter how many times they punch it, nothing happens.  They’ve tried everything and so far nothing is working for them.  Why?  Because there is no “Value” left in the system, and without that “Value”, they having been unable to continue their Money based monopoly game.  

…. unless of course, they can convince you to give them YOUR value.

And that is the entire point of this article: 


I was just sent this message on skype and I thought that it sort of tied in nicely with what we’ve just been talking about:


Hi D
Just found this at the top of John MacHaffie’s blog. Then it quickly disappeared…

Hi John,

Please feel free to post this on the blog if you feel the need to.
First off I’m gonna say this. I don’t mean to put a damper on anything or be the bearer of bad news, but this is just my perspective, based on what I see happening, my research and what resonates with me.

Now. How many times have we all heard over the past year or so that the RV is happening “tomorrow” or “Tuesday” or “it will only happen between Tuesday and Thursday” or “next week” or “it’s all done” funds are being distributed”.

I don’t mean to beat up on any gurus but let’s face it, they’ve all been wrong so far. Especially the ones telling us that the RV is tomorrow,Tuesday or Friday etc.

We even have “Sananda” and “God” himself telling us that the RV is done. Really? Then where the hell is it then? Nobody wants to hear bad news and it’s kinda encouraging for some of us to hear exactly what we want to hear from some entity through a “Channel”. In my humble opinion some of these entities can’t know much more than we do about the RV/GCR because even THEY can’t get it right. If that’s true then why the hell do we listen to them? Because we all want the RV like yesterday.

Now that we got the BS out of the way let’s focus on the real stuff and what we can do.

Reality check: The Dark Cabal are still in power, albeit with reduced venom.

What’s the use of an RV with the Cabal still in power? Think about it. We all want to exchange our Dinar/Dong/ Zimbabwe Dollar etc. Let’s get one thing straight people. An RV/GCR with the Cabal in control of the current global banking system would be suicide for all of us.

We’ve been seriously screwed globally by the cabal and if an RV happened today most of us would go out on a wild spending spree. How many people would go out and buy a new million dollar mansion? Or pay off their mortgage? Or go and buy the Ferrari Enzo? Well, ask yourself. Where is the money going? If you haven’t figured it out yet, it’s going straight back to The Cabal!

Ask yourself, do you really want an RV with The Cabal still in power? Huh?
My point here is this. The Cabal have to be totally removed before a proper RV can happen. Period.

I don’t care what anyone says or whether you believe in God, Source, Prime Creator, Jesus or not but the “RV” is NOT JUST ABOUT THE MONEY FOLKS!
There is a deeply spiritual aspect to this RV” as it’s called.

This is why I believe the RV hasn’t happened and will not happen before certain things take place. Those things are two in number and are connected.

1. The Cabal have to be removed…BY US! How the hell do we do that I hear you ask? Which leads to action number

We are the ones we’ve been waiting for, and until humanity stands up and demand our freedom, their ain’t gonna be no RV.

Sure, we’ll get all the help we need from different groups, whether it be positive Military, Police, Interpol, ET’s or whatever, but they ain’t gonna do jack until we get out there en masse and demand our freedom from the thugs that have taken it from us.

To my knowledge there’s only been two sources of info that have been consistently spot on about what I’ve addressed above, and that’s COBRA of 2012 portal and D of Removing the Shackles.

The more this carries on the more I see that they’re both right.

On May16th,17th 2014 and possibly beyond there is gonna be a major standing up event called Operation American Spring. I strongly believe that this will be the event that will trigger THE EVENT. Please visit for more details.

We need as many people as possible in DC for this event. Even if you can’t get to Washington DC, please do everything you can to spread the word.

First we take back America then the World.

Please spread the word about this event far and wide. This is not meant to be a one or two day event then everybody goes home. The plan is to STAND OUR GROUND until demands are met.

Maybe I’m wrong about the above but it’s what resonates with me. I’ll say this again, and that’s that there is a deeply spiritual aspect to the RV. If it ain’t happening, then maybe God’s trying to tell us something and we ain’t listening.

I want the RV just as bad as anyone else so let’s all do something to make it happen. Let’s make Operation American Spring a massive event to send a clear message to the Dark Cabal that WE’VE HAD ENOUGH OF THEIR BS!

Spread the word far and wide.

God Bless America, God Bless Planet Earth (GAIA)

[9:36:08 PM] XXX: I have no idea who wrote it and why it disappeared, but there is some truth to it.

[9:46:30 PM] D.Breakingthesilence: lol- a lot.    I mean, there is lots of missing pieces , but yes, it’s very true

[9:47:39 PM] XXX: I wonder if it is someone trying to incite people to join the march on DC to begin some conflict?

[9:48:39 PM] D.Breakingthesilence: could be.  but then could also be someone just trying to get people off their asses and to take charge of themselves and stop waiting around for someone to save them

[9:49:26 PM] XXX: Which ain’t a bad thing either!! LOL

[9:50:00 PM] D.Breakingthesilence: exactly


Please my friends, BE smart.  Play safe.  And remember…..

Without Prejudice

I ran across this information this afternoon while researching the Green Hilton Agreement – Geneva 1963.


Posted from:

 from Ayemmo Website

2008 November 28

The Green Hilton Agreement Geneva 1963


By 1961, Keynes predictions of a world monetary crisis began to become a reality.


This problem was brought about by the lack of sufficient currency (especially US Dollars) in world circulation to support the rapidly expanding international commerce. The World needed US Dollars beyond the capacity of the good faith and credit of the United States Taxpayer in order to facilitate trade.


It was not possible to break the Bretton Woods treaty due to the possible damage of the stable core of the world’s economy as this had the potential of leading to another major war. To compound the problem, the majority of dollars in circulation were in private banks, multinational corporations, private businesses and individual bank accounts.

In 1963 the gold that had been entrusted to the care of President Soekarno was recalled by the Nations to underpin the issuance of further US Dollars in order to further facilitate international trade. Under this Agreement, Soekarno (as the International Trustee Holder of the Gold) began the process of repositioning the gold that had earlier been entrusted to the care of the Indonesian People, back into the banking system to create a fractional backing for the US Dollar.


Initially this was managed under the arbitration of the Tripartite Gold Commission in The Hague as per the decisions of the International Community through their Government representatives at the Innsbruck/Schweitzer Conference and its later revisions.


Under the agreement signed between President Soekarno and President John Kennedy, was that control of these assets would cede automatically to US upon the fall from power of President Soekarno.


This occurred in 1967. The potential of this agreement led to Executive Order 11110 issued July 1963, which would have provided the Department of the Treasury the power to issue United States Dollars. Within two weeks after signing the Green Hilton Agreement which would have then enabled consolidation of EO 11110.


Kennedy was assassinated a few days after his signing of the Green Hilton Agreement. With the death of Kennedy, the authority granted to the Treasury was never taken up.

Soekarno was awarded a 2.5% interest in the assets by the International Community in return for his services. He willed all the documents of guarantee and obligation to his Teacher ***** ***** ******** and his heir, ** **** *** ********.

To this day, these agreements stand to be honored (which was accommodated in full under the “RESPECTING THE RIGHTS TREATY – BANGKOK – 2003). The assets were placed into the International Collateral Combined Accounts that form the Global Debt Facility.  (I am assuming this is the SWISSINDO WORLD ORBIT TRUST.)

While an apparently innocuous document to read, in it’s proper and full interpretation, The Green Hilton Agreement is one of the most profound agreements made between Presidents of any two countries within the twentieth century, and most probably, in the history of the world, particularly so as this agreement was made between a President of the United States and the Trustee of the hidden, but combined wealth of the world.


These assets are not the property of the United States, but centralized assets under the authority of a centralized system, to be used as independently deemed to be for the better benefit of the World.


Original Message —–
From: PZ
To: <>
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 3:56 AM
Subject: Wanta Fraud and Whistleblower

*Regarding: Wanta Fraud and Mr. Whistleblower*

FROM: Mr. Whistleblower
SENT: Tuesday, Mardch 04, 2008 11:56 p.m.
SUBJECT: Wanta Fraud
Regardless if one agrees with the account given by Mr. Whistleblower, there is one sentence which fails to connect to the other parts of the story.

He writes:

“At the same time, and there are two prominent points here, successive US Governments from 1963, following the execution of the *Green Hilton Treaty by President Kennedy and President Soekarno* (Note: Kennedy was assassinated 10 days after the signing of this Treaty), refused to recognize the Combined International Accounts and the Green Hilton Treaty.”


As I have seen the Green Hilton Treaty (full title: Agreement Green Hilton Memorial Building Geneve and Certificate of Geneve, signed by 3 persons, witnessed by 9 persons) some years back, I am wondering what the connection between the Wanta case and the Green Hilton Treaty might be? Can you forward my question to Mr. Whistleblower and act as a go-between for his replay?

Thanks and best regards

—– Original Message —–
From: Whistleblower
To: Bellringer
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Wanta Fraud and Whistleblower

Dear Mr Bellringer,
In response to the question from PZ.

Dear PZ:
Thank you for your question via

Our response on same follows:

The comments in question do not relate directly to the other content. They are meant to clearly indicate that the US, by not recognizing the Green Hilton Treaty, actually deny that the assets held by President Soekarno are part of the Combined International Collateral Accounts of the Global Debt Facility, thus implying that they still belong to the original Owners (hereditary or otherwise).


The fact is that assets held by Soekarno were not owned by Indonesia, its’ numerous Sultanates, or otherwise, but by several other countries, Royal Families, etc. which were deposited in Indonesia commencing 1921, which is the very same period as assets were deposited in The Philippines.

It was the Japanese who were charged by the World’s Nations to undertake the excavation of tunnels, mines, bunkers, etc, and deposit assets within same as and when then were shipped to Indonesia.

It is common knowledge that over the years the US has deliberately broadcast over the Airwaves, that they are the real owners and that anyone locating or finding any assets should report same to the US Embassy immediately. This was a ploy by the US to locate assets and ultimately steal them. Not recognizing the Green Hilton Treaty, which was relevant to Indonesia and President Soekarno, allowed the US to lay claim to the assets and thus steal / plunder them for their own purpose.

Additionally, the US, by its denials and non-recognition of the Green Hilton Treaty, opened the doors for descendants of President Soekarno, plus many others who were appointed as Secondary Holders, Administrators, Sub-secondary Holders / Custodians etc by President Soekarno (Note: we hold a full list of these people, which is embodied within President Soekarno’s records, Volume 4), to lay claim to the assets held in Indonesia.

(This is Mr. Sino, or Sugu of the SWISSINDO – GSE Initiative signed March 11, 2014 – Cirebon, Indonesia)

The very same situation arises with The Philippines and other countries. In Russia alone, during the Yeltsin era, President Clinton claimed that the Gold deposited in Russia was actually owned by the US. Thousands of MT of Gold were moved out of Russia by train into Switzerland and Germany, under orders of President Yeltsin.

This movement was monitored and President Yeltsin was held to order on this. His condition to step down from the Presidency of the Russian Federation, entailed a Full International Immunity from prosecution for his criminal acts of Theft of Assets from the Collateral Accounts in conjunction with others (These acts are beginning to come back and bite the other persons involved quite viciously).

Coming back to the point of issue. The statement was made as an example to indicate the tactics used by the US to steal, illegally use, plunder, etc the assets of the Combined International Collateral Accounts. The example was considered to be the best possible example as it linked to a situation in the US which is still questionable today. Other examples could not be used as much as this, and corrective actions against such illegal use, abuse, theft etc, are all “Classified”.

In respect of your statement claiming you have seen the Green Hilton Treaty. We do not dispute your claim on this, but advise as to caution. The reason being is that there are at least Three (3) known forgeries of this Treaty in existence. There may be more. All differ from each other and all of them do lead to confusion with those who make claims of having read the Treaty.

It is not known who composed any of the forgeries, although guesses are abound.

The “Real” Treaty states, that an agreement has been reached, and shall be referred to as a “Treaty” between Sovereign Nations, by the President of the United States and the President of Indonesia, that Assets of the Combined International Collateral Accounts pursuant to Treaties ……. (numerous Treaties referred to) ……. and held under Custodianship within Indonesia, shall be transferred to ……… (Name of location in the USA) ……… and utilized by the USA to fractionally back the International Currency of the US Dollar. Note, the content of the treaty actually states several further issues, but the above is the main issue.

In return for President Soekarno’s cooperation in this matter, conjointly with the Owner / Sole Arbiter, Indonesia were given financial Hereditary rights equal to 2.5% of the value of the assets, to be used within Indonesia to assist in the development of the country.

Those rights and with full reference to the Green Hilton Treaty were confirmed within the “Recognizing the Rights” Treaty, Bangkok, Thailand, dated 2003.

You will also find reference to all of this within various Schweitzer / Innsbruck Conventions.

Needless to say, the assets have yet to be used for the benefit of Indonesia. Some have been moved illegally, some stolen / plundered, but basically the two aforementioned Treaties remain ineffective and unrecognized by the US, whom, through the Federal Reserve prevent movement, allotment, allocation, or otherwise of same for use not only for Indonesia, but for every other country in the World and the People.

Many Indonesians, as with Filipinos, travel the World holding various Gold and Platinum Bullion Certificates, claiming they are the owners of the Bullion, only to be arrested and incarcerated. This will continue until the Truth comes out.

There is no direct connection to the Wanta case, as may or may not have been implied. The statement was used as an example to indicate to others what mechanisms are used by the US and others to illegal use, steal, plunder, etc, assets of the Combined International Collateral Accounts.

We apologize if this lead to a misunderstanding, as we did not purposely or intentionally design this statement to be misleading.

There are many factors connected to the Combined International Collateral Accounts, illegal activities, theft, plunder, etc that are all inter-related in one way or another whereby to isolate one issue away from all the others is not easy. To understand the enormity of the situation one has to understand the whole picture and appreciate the relativity of one part to other parts.

We do not purposely or intentionally restrict illegal activities to the US, although the US is responsible for a substantial majority of the problems involved. Other Countries, Central Banks, Rogue elements of Intelligence Agencies, Commercial Banks, individuals, have also been active in the area of Theft, Plunder, Illegal use.

We hope that this has satisfactory explained the statement we have made, and we thank you for your interest in same. Please feel free to seek further answers should you find the need to do so.

Kindest regards.


Additional information at “QUESTIONS TO MR. WHISTLEBLOWER (Updated April 29, 2009)”.





Strange Discussion on Wikipedia About…

“Green Hilton Agreement”

July 18, 2006

from CassiopaeaForum Website


Your continued donations keep Wikipedia running!
User talk:Executor-usa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I’m sorry but I had to block you and the other editor you were warring with for violating the Three-revert rule. I have made the block for 11 hours for both parties to accept that this will have be talked out, not warred out. –Alf melmac 23:25, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

ALF, I have accurate and verified information that OITC is real and not a fraud. It has been subject to a disinformation campaign throughout the internet. Since this site purports to provide encyclopedia information, it should not be used as a disinformation site. If you have proper security clearances and authorizations, and follow protocols for level 3-5 security rules you can get a verification.


I communicate with top level government officials and so do others posting against this disinformation campaign. Your other poster has no real information, only disinformation and the spreading of false stories by authors who never had access or proper information.

In the meantime, guidance for disputes over accuracy is laid out at Wikipedia:Accuracy dispute and the process for resolving disputes is laid out at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. –Alf melmac 23:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

I thank the pair of you for being understanding and replying so postively. I hope the matter can be resolved amicably. –Alf melmac 23:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

This is an unusual situation. It involves classified institutions protected by the US Congress under security rules 3-5. If you have such security clearence, the Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee has the full jacket. It requires formal authorization. This is not a dispute that can be settled by the uninformed and unauthorized. Allowing the authorship and reprinting of intentional misinformation in this case is improper.

No amount of unauthorized research will turn up anything of substance, only misinformation. The other party writing, can only find and post misinformation. News stories etc do not provide truth. If you happen to be a head of state or head of a central bank, providing that you follow security protocols, you can get verification. Treaties between nations, and classified protocols attached to them, are a fact of life that impacts this discussion.

Classifying this as a fraud and implying that its officers are criminals is improper. The courts have ruled that no web site may be exempt from the rules of defamation. The author Waffelknocker is a police officer who has investigated OITC and who knows that it is real and neither a fraud nor otherwise criminal.


Your other author just repeats falsehoods and stories written without access to real information. OITC is very real. Classification protocols are intended to prevent unauthorized access, and this frustrates many writers who think that they deserve such information. He, however, knowingly ignores all countering information, as such his own behavior is now quite possibly criminally slanderous. intentionally deleted sources supporting the information provided by Waffelknocker. I believe that permitting this misinformation campaign to persist is defamatory and I will recommend that litigation is initiated.


* 1 Hello, OITC Thailand
* 2 Blocked for legal threats
* 3 Hi, OITC Thailand
* 4 Who are you?


Hello, OITC Thailand

Hey, you guys there in Thailand… Do you really think you are going to scare us by saying that you are “police officers” and “have links with international authorities”? You are nothing but a bunch of cheap scammers, trying to make a buck out of the backs of poor people. You failed miserably in the Rover case, in Fiji and now in Ecuador.


Mind you, now the info about your escapades is all over the net. And we are monitoring you to check where else the ugly head of your scam shows up. So keep going on, people, because now there are some good citizens that will take the time and effort to unmask you, no matter where you go or what language you use. Say hi to Pablito and Keith (if you are Ray ;) Sayonara!

REPLY: Wrong people. The promise about litigation is real. No scams have ever been done by OITC. See you in court.

REPLY 2: Like you took the Fiji Times / Fiji Sun / Fiji Village to court? No kidding, they are still waiting to hear from your lawyer. They are also looking forward to seeing “Dr.” Scott coming back… But of course, none of that will happen. Fatty Scott will never go back. INTERPOL is checking on him as well as on Chchat :)


REPLY 3: Oh, really? Good that you console yourself that way :) Once their agents come knocking at your door you will feel a bit surprised, thought ;) About court, again, I most certainly will see you there… while you and your helpers are tried for fraud :) Looking forward to it!

Reply to reply 3: The only charges will be defamation charges against you and other defamatory writers. See you in court. It will be a pleasure taking your house and assets:)

REPLY 4: As you were thinking in taking over the houses and assets of the tribal in Fiji? Man, oh man, what sweets dreams were destroyed by a few good journalists and the Fiji Government and Police :) Bet you were already licking your lips thinking in all the good land you were going to get for free. Too bad Commissioner Hughes is a no-nonsense officer ;) About court, are you going to use there the same fake adress you put in the letter you sent with your fake offer for Rover? ;) If so, at least change again the number of the house, it is getting overused ;)

Blocked for legal threats

Per Wikipedia’s policy on legal threats, you are indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia until your threat(s) of legal action against editors is either withdrawn or concluded. When this happens, edit this page (you may still do so), leave the text {{unblock}} at the top and explain that you will no longer be threatening legal action against editors. –Sam Blanning(talk) 22:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Then this will have to be resolved in court. Not a threat, but a promise. This site and the writers have a legal obligation to not publish malicious defamatory material. I request that this article be deleted.

In the spirit of goodwill, I’m willing to nominate the article for deletion on your behalf, and outside editors will discuss whether Wikipedia should keep it. Would you like to provide a brief overview of the reasons why the article should be deleted for the benefit of editors? Please make it as succint as possible. –Sam Blanning(talk) 22:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

This is part of a worldwide disinformation campaign against OITC. Waffelknocker is a police officer who has investigated OITC. He has posted accurate information supported by fact. OITC is a classified UN Chartered institution. The full jacket, security level 3-5, is held by the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. Verification requires authorization. Chapter One on Redcat’s Precious Metals Board has published a letter from the General Counsel of the US Treasury in support of OITC and its’ Chairman. He has had the letter verified. The writers of this article only publish falsehoods, misinformation, and lies. They do so knowingly. They delete all writings contrary to their own misinformation campaign. They do so even when their own writings are left alone. Any lawsuit against these writers will have as witnesses the US Attorney General, as well as other such positioned officials. This is a fact based upon personal knowledge. Do not damage this site by allowing it to be used for malicious defamers. No amount of discussion on this site by the uninformed will bear any fruit. You cannot resolve this conflict.

I’ve started a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OITC fraud. It will last at least five days before being closed. –Sam Blanning(talk) 23:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

A comment on the deletion discussion raised a question about UN Chartered Control numbers. This might help you : Redcat’s Boards

> Precious Metals Discussion Forum
> UN “Charter” definition

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>


Subject: UN “Charter” definition Posted By: Chapter10 – Registered User Posted At: (3/29/06 1:40)

UN “Charter” definition:

As stated within several United Nations Official Publications, some of which can be found on the UN Web site, others are the official legal definitions as attributed by the United Nations and found within records of the United Nations Library.


The term “Charter” is used for particularly formal and solemn instruments, such as the constituent treaty of an International Organization. The term itself has an emotive content that goes back to the Magna Carta of 1215. Well known recent examples are the Charter of the United Nations of 1945 and the Charter of the Organization of American States.

Upon ascertaining the above definition, the question was posed as to how is a particular Charter for a particular “Constituent treaty of an International Organization” (using the very words as provided from the Web and given by the UN Official) could be located and thus viewed. Reply, quote “Each Charter is allocated a Control Number, for referencing and recording purposes. If you want to find a particular Charter you will be required to quote the Control Number. Is there anything else Sir. Is there a specific Charter you would like to know about Sir.”


The question was posed, quote “Are all Charters under the United Nations subject to Public Access to Information Acts”. Reply, quote “No Sir, there are many such documents that are classified, which are not available for Public Access.” “How many”. Reply, quote “Many Sir. Is there a particular Charter you are enquiring about”. “No, no particular Charter. This is a general enquiry for a paper I am writing. Thank you for your help.” Reply, quote “Glad to be of assistance Sir. If you need further information, please call back. Goodbye”.

The above is a transcript of a telephone conversation between a 22 year old University Student in the U.K. studying Law, and an official at the United Nations, Geneva. At the same time the student was on the Web with the United Nations Web site open, clicking on various sections based upon words or directions given by the UN official. The telephone call was quite extensive. The above are the pertinent points of the conversation held. General conversation to and from each person is not relevant and not transcribed.

Also posted by the same party:” I can also state that this letter has been verified as being issued by Russell L. Munk, International Division, US Treasury, Washington DC, 20220, USA. A further letter has now been delivered to the US Treasury, Senior Counsel US Treasury, Mr Arnold I. Havens. This letter (following verification of the Munk letter) details specific pertinent questions more elaborate that the answers contained in Munk’s letter. It will be posted when a response is received.

I can state that Russell L. Munk has now been verified as the General Counsel, International Department, US Treasury, Washington D.C. 20220, USA, at the date of the letter. My comments in the previous posts are as a result of thorough investigations undertaken by some very senior friends working for a Police Authority. It would be highly unusual for them to make a mistake, so I will admit to the possibility of an accidental omission, from a possible brief loss of concentration, of the word Assistant in respect of Mr Munk.


It is however irrelevant as to Mr Munk’s position, as the actual letter is confirmed, by the very same friends who have been in communication with the US Treasury, as being issued and signed by Russell Munk.

We have to look at the overall situation and protocol involved. If what we are led to believe is fact, then it would be reasonable to assume that any inquiry letter would have been addressed to the General Counsel of the US Treasury. In which case, it is more than possible that the said letter was passed to Russell Munk for a response, as he was of the International Division of the US Treasury, but under the auspices of General Counsel.


This being the case and the fact that the inquiry was addressed to the General Counsel it would be highly respectful and indeed protocol (remember what we are told that H.E. R.C. Dam is a protected person, with level 3 -5 security, confirmed by the US Senate) to ensure that the response came from the General Counsel, irrespective of the signature provided the signature was from a person who holds the authority, position and responsibility to sign such letters, either as legally representing the US Treasury, or under authority of the General Counsel.

I believe that the General Counsel and Deputy General Counsel are political appointments, which in itself may have some bearing on the issue, considering that the accusation has been made in the past about the US Government and its Intelligence Agencies illegally using the assets owned by R.C. Dam held under the Combined International Collateral Accounts.


That would certainly account for a delegated responsibility factor, as I am reasonably sure in saying that the political appointments would surely hesitate from putting their signatures to such a letter.

I don’t think the actual letter or signatory can be “questionable” as you put it, because of the verification process undertaken, initiated and undertaken in conjunction with myself / police authority. What is more to the point is the system of authority, delegation, position and responsibility that is operational within the US Treasury, which I believe only the US Treasury can inform us on this matter, as it is internal operations (sometimes politically oriented) and not normally known to the public.

Just for the record, I am unbiased on this whole issue, and I do not post all precise detail, which is where people tend to “pick up” on certain issues. Whether the OITC exists or not has yet to be proven. As yet I have seen no proof that it doesn’t exist, despite all the anti-postings which lack substance. I have seen sufficient pro-OITC postings, with good information, and have undertaken enormous research using some of that information.


My opinion, as at this moment, is that the possibility of the existence of the OITC is beginning to look more real based upon the evidence I have at hand undertaken by myself, friends in a police authority, and several others including lawyers, UN officials, Members of the Queens Court, and Lords of the Realm, even conversations with OITC people. You can’t get much better, or much higher.


Whether I utilize one source or more at the same time and on the same point, I get the same answers. I have yet to substantiate any of the anti-OITC comments posted on this Board and in the Press, but I do admit, I haven’t really focused on past histories of individuals involved, suppositions, conjecture or similar. All research is based upon pertinent and relevant points that are the Start Line…… Where the Finish Line is has yet to be seen.

I do not see much effort from other posters to obtain real information. All I have seen is “Cut and Paste” stuff and simple general information without much substance.”

OITC does not have a web site, it is classified, it has no connection to Nigeria or any Nigerians.

OITC does not lend money, it is an investor. It takes no fees, NO FEES at ALL. PER SE it cannot be an advance fee scam, and it does not provide credits as alleged. Waffelknocker provided proper sources. If you want a letter from OITC’s lawyer, one can be arranged.

Since I cannot comment directly to the discussion re deleting this article, I hope that my additions to this talk reply are read and incorporated into the discussion.

Also posted by Chapter 10 on 4/18/06:

To counteract your repetitive old post, I will also refer partially to the same tactic by reposting the US Treasury Letter and (something NEW) a retype of the US Treasury Letter.

(US Treasury Letter)


(Retype of US Treasury Letter)

As the original Munk letter is partly illegible I have retyped same so that it is legible.

I can state that Russell L. Munk has now been verified as the General Counsel, International Department, US Treasury, Washington D.C. 20220, USA, at the date of the letter. Mr Munk, from what I am informed is no longer with that department, having been moved to head the department responsible for assisting Iraq is re-establishing their Treasury and Central Bank. In fact it wasn’t long ago that he was actually in Iraq.

I can also state that this letter has been verified as being issued by Russell L. Munk, International Division, US Treasury, Washington DC, 20220, USA.


A further letter has now been delivered to the US Treasury, Senior Counsel US Treasury, Mr Arnold I. Havens. This letter (following verification of the Munk letter) details specific pertinent questions more elaborate that the answers contained in Munk’s letter. It will be posted when a response is received.

I can also state that a Police Authority (and not from some two bit Banana Republic) has undertaken enquiries on both Ray C. Dam and Keith Scott and have established that these persons are not crooks, convicts, gangsters, criminals or similar.

Your comments are too long to be incorporated into the discussion, but I’ve noted on the discussion that you’ve made further arguments. –Sam Blanning(talk) 08:47, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

OITC invests, it does not take anyone’s money or property. Since it does not seek money it is per se not a scam of any financial type .It scams no party. Either it delivers assets or funds or it does not. The argument that it is a scam is illogical. Who is it harming? What is presented by claimants is gossip, speculation and ignorance. No credible evidence of criminal behavior has ever been presented.


It is interesting that when an institution offers to do good and help people with concrete assets of independent valuation and verification that parties smear it. Waffelknocker provided information that valuable assets were delivered and verified by reputable financial institutions. Quoting old news stories speculation about OITC when actual assets have been delivered and verified subsequent to the news stories is intentionally misleading. OITC has in fact provided two addresses to the Fiji Government, according to its lawyer. Waffelknocker has provided an address as well.

I address this to khaosworks. If you have the proper security clearance and access, the President of China is quite knowledgeable about OITC.

How do I provide the administrators an 11 page history, and how do I make sure that it cannot be edited by someone else. The file is a modification locked word file, but I cannot upload it.


OITC is not, and never asserted, that it is part of the Federal Reserve. OITC is Chartered by the UN, it is legally considered an independent, sovereign jurisdiction.


The Federal Reserve has accounts for sovereign jurisdictions. No bank may respond to an inquiry about an account holder without permission of the account holder.

Appointed January 20, 1995 by the Governments of the World to Act as Sole Arbiter, Owner and Controller of The International Collateral Combined Accounts of the Global Debt Facility.

The File of H.E. Dr. Ray C. Dam is Secured by U.S. Congress under 3rd Level to the 5th Level Rules, with Appointment and Protective reaffirmed by the United States Senate. His Excellency Dr. Ray C. Dam is an International Protected Person.


Elected by those qualified to elect under the existing International Agreements in accordance with the Articles of the Bank for International Settlements (January 20, 1930), on January 20, 1995, Dr. Dam was elected and appointed by the International Community as the Sole Arbiter of all those assets that form the Collateral of International Combined in conformance to that agreed and assented to by the forefathers of that community of nations whose Central Banks are connected to (or were at that time connected to) The Bank for International Settlements.

These include such agreements as The Tripartite Trilateral Trillenium Pact(a Pact between the Kingdoms and Colonial Powers of the World, London 1921) and subsequent international agreements and revisions thereof including and not limited to,

  • The Bretton Woods Agreement (New Hampshire 1944)

  • The B.I.S. Agreement with the Allies (Bern 1948)

  • The Green Hilton Agreement (Geneva, 1963)

  • The Schweitzer Convention (Innsbruck, 1968)

  • The Amendments to the Foreign Gold Act (Washington, 1972)

That the rights and authorities of His Excellency, Dr. Ray C. Dam are ABSOLUTE and UNLIMITED and entered in the records of the United Nations and all major Financial Institutions and Law Enforcement Agencies under International Control No. 10-60847 and the registration with the Combined Banks Holding the assets of Account, such record held within,

  • The Federal Reserve System

  • The Department of the Treasury of the United States of America

  • The Swiss Federal Finance Administration

  • The Swiss National Bank and certain commercial banks

All such accounts of the International Collateral Combined are under the Sole and Arbitrary right of control that was ceded to His Excellency Dr. Ray C. Dam on January 20, 1995 by the International Community and exercised through Consolidated Credit Bank Limited (THIS IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH A NIGERIAN SCAM THAT WAS RUN OUT OF LONDON AND STOPPED).


Under these authorities, no decision of the Federal Reserve or the Department of the Treasury of the United States or Freddie Mac or of any Holder may usurp the institutional authority of the Sole Arbiter and Owner.


The right of His Excellency, Dr. Ray C. Dam is established under an Agreement between Nations with security codes registered with the United Nations and all major government security and law enforcement agencies.

More History

See “Brief Historical Perspective - from ‘The History of The Powers And Authorities – Of His Excellency Dr. Ray C. Dam’

Posted from:


Delegate Diaries – SWISSINDO WORLD ORBIT TRUST YouTube Channel


These short videos are from the  March 11, 2014 Signing of GSE CVAC.











Karin Kolland

Posted from:
The Sedona Connection

Dave-Schmidt-The-Sedona-Connection1-200x200In the last week I described the process of the bonds being released to pay for the RV. I’ll discuss a new video released this week of the history behind those bonds and the gold kept throughout Asia. President Seokarno of Indonesia was the former trustee of the gold and it has now been passed on to his son. This week he released those funds for the RV. We’ll discuss this on this weeks radio program.

The RV is Unfolding, the New Development of the Seokarno Gold.

- Dave Schmidt


Related link:


Posted from:

Facebook Kelly Killian Sutton

What Makes Money Valuable?

In the United States neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. Intrinsically, a dollar bill is just a piece of paper, deposits merely book entries. Coins do have some intrinsic value as metal, but generally far less than their face value. What, then, makes these instruments – checks, paper money, and coins – acceptable at face value in payment of all debts and for other monetary uses?

Mainly, it is the confidence people have that they will be able to exchange such money for other financial assets and for real goods and services whenever they choose to do so.

Money, like anything else, derives its value from its scarcity in relation to its usefulness. Commodities or services are more or less valuable because there are more or less of them relative to the amounts people want. Money’s usefulness is its unique ability to command other goods and services and to permit a holder to be constantly ready to do so.

How much money is demanded depends on several factors, such as the total volume of transactions in the economy at any given time, the payments habits of the society, the amount of money that individuals and businesses want to keep on hand to take care of unexpected transactions, and the forgone earnings of holding financial assets in the form of money rather than some other asset.


A Workbook on Bank Reserves and Deposit Expansion
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
This complete booklet is was originally produced and distributed free by: Public Information Center Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago P. O. Box 834 Chicago, IL 60690-0834 telephone: 312 322 5111 But it is now out of print. Photo copies can be made available by


Download PDF


All the more reason to be intelligent and
understand Money Consciousness