Posts Tagged ‘fraud’

Posted from:

http://www.oom2.com/t39131-anna-von-reitz-6-15-2016#88032

_________________

Posted on June 15, 2016 by arnierosner
On Jun 15, 2016, at 10:58 AM, Arnie Rosner <arnie@arnierosner.com> wrote:
Mr. Farrow,

Please find a response from Judge Anna. As you may recall, Judge Anna is a superior court judge of the land jurisdiction of the lawful state, Alaska. Not to be confused with the state of Alaska…the franchised branch of the bankrupt corporation of which has been noted.

Please let us know if you have further questions.

arnie
“You only think you know!”

The flag of the Continental united States of America
arnie@arnierosner.com
http://scannedretina.com
714-964-4056
714-501-8247 – mobile

On Jun 15, 2016, at 10:42 AM, Anna von Reitz <avannavon@gmail.com> wrote:
As I have explained many times before, what we are dealing with and what we have dealt with since the beginning of this country, is a situation where very lucrative government services contracts have been received by “governmental services corporations”. This fact has been obscured and partly hidden from the less-than observant public and over the years for lack of true oversight the situation has become abusive.

In the beginning the Virginia Trading Company and several of the other old trading companies that financed the expansion into the New World banded together to form the United States (Trading Company). That was bankrupted by Lincoln in 1863 and when the dust settled several new entities organized as corporations emerged, chief among them, The United States of America, Inc, the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation, and the United States of America, Inc., all of which were bankrupted and/or morphed into still other corporate entities. It was the United States of America, Inc. that Franklin Delano Roosevelt bankrupted in 1933 and which stayed in reorganization until 1999. It was used as a pass-through, like a siphon, for the creditors of this bankrupt privately owned corporation to suck the American People dry under false presumptions and equally false pretenses, but it was by far NOT the only pig at the trough.

We have suffered through the US Corp which was the principal defense agency corporation during World War II, the USA, Inc., which has been famous for prison industry and other industry-related abuses, the US, Inc. which has similarly failed any mission of “Public Good”, the WASHINGTON DC MUNICIPALITY, one of the most corrupt and inefficient governments to ever exist on planet Earth, and from 1944 onward, we have suffered all the slime-ball tactics of the UNITED STATES, INC., a French-sponsored IMF spin-off, here on our soil acting as the colluding partner to the United States of America, Inc., during its bankruptcy reorganization from 1944 to 1999 and since then operating as the overall “service provider” under March of 2015 when it finally went insolvent and couldn’t even pay the interest on its debts.

Since then we have had yet another one of the “governmental services corporations” go bankrupt, this one calling itself THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.

The UNITED STATES (INC.) was so deplorably mismanaged that it cannot qualify for bankruptcy reorganization and is being liquidated.   THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. is in Chapter 11 Reorganization and Mr. Obama has gratuitously named franchises of this bankrupt entity after each one of us. You will note that mail addressed to your name in the form: JOHN K. DOE has begun arriving in your mailbox. That’s the name of the bankrupt franchise. He is attempting to pull another FDR scam on us and set up a new siphon to drain us dry.

Another corporation calling itself the GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES (INC.) that picked up numerous subsidiary brand names like BLM and FBI is responsible for the entire fiasco in Oregon that resulted in the Wildlife Refuge standoff and the murder of LaVoy Finicum. These are nothing but commercial companies in the business of providing “governmental services”. They have come in here and bought up the brand names and trade marks of older bankrupted corporations just like Proctor and Gamble might acquire the “Twinkies” and “Wonder Bread” brand names and trademarks and begin making its own version of both products without the public ever even knowing that these seemingly familiar “agencies” are under new management.

People often ask me— how is it possible that we haven’t known this? How is it possible that we haven’t been aware of any of these bankruptcies, except the one in 1933—which hardly anyone has mentioned for years?

These are all privately owned corporations. These are all private bankruptcies. And these bankruptcies can take place anywhere in the world. The Trustees of these bankrupt entities can be anyone that the creditors agree to name.  In view of the false claims these vermin have made and all making on the American People, it is to their advantage to keep these bankruptcies “closely held” and out of the public eye. That way nobody has a chance to object to the false presumptions being made by the Trustees and very few people have the chance to bring forward their claims against the rats.

So, that is what is going on and what has been going on since 1863. If you buy a copy of our book, “You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” you will see a Public Lien being published which names the rats responsible, and in the back of the book, you will see a UCC-1 Financing Statement that tells just a small portion of the debt owed to the American People.

What has become abundantly clear is that vast numbers of corporations worldwide have been used and abused to create illegal and unlawful monopolies and they have operated as crime syndicates by buying up police forces and armies and most recently “government agencies” which they have run as commercial mercenary armies operating on our soil under color of law. Good examples of this are the FBI actions at Ruby Ridge, the BATF and DOJ at Waco, and more recently, the BLM and FBI attack on LaVoy Finicum and the others in Oregon.

The FBI is a particularly egregious example, as it is often misdirected and employed in the cause of blatant crime, while failing to investigate and prosecute the exact forms of crime that it is tasked with combatting. Early on, I informed the FBI about the reverse trust scam being operated by the banks in mortgage foreclosure cases. I contacted them with complete information multiple times. They did nothing.

Why?

Because although the mission of the FBI is clearly stated and public, and they receive public monies on the assumption that they are performing the job they claim to be performing, their “private mission” is something else entirely. In public, they are supposed to be combatting crimes of interstate trafficking, commercial fraud including interstate banking fraud, illegal restraint of trade and numerous other related duties—in fact, they avoid doing these jobs and act as enforcers of private corporate objectives instead. As most of those objectives have materialized as neglect of their public mission statement and have instead involved the murder of innocent people in the course of promoting such activities as illicit drug trade you may judge for yourselves what the mission of the FBI really is.

Similar circumstances apply to the misnamed “DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE” and virtually every other “governmental services corporation” you can name. Even the DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE is in it up to their hips in expediting human trafficking and illegal taking of property that rightfully belongs to the people of this nation and these United States as opposed to “those” United States.

Advertisements

One of the most thorough examination of the Birth Certificate fraud which is one of the crimes committed against the Peoples of the Earth for hundreds of years.

Angel Lucci

—————————-

Posted from:

Escapee’s Blog
2nd Dark Age A-Coming

http://escapeesblog.wordpress.com/2012/01/09/birth-settlement-certificates/

—————————-

Very interesting Mr. “Bond”.

From: http://euro-union-court.org/info_ecclesiastical_deed/edp_birth_certificates.htm

Via: http://kentfreedommovement.ning.com/profiles/blogs/ecclesiastical-deed-poll

A Settlement Certificate, also known as a “Birth Certificate” since 1837, is an official document issued to validly recorded poor (paupers) granting them certain basic rights and entitlement to benefits in exchange for recognition of their status as being owned as “property” and lawful slaves, also known as indentured servants and bondsmen. A “settlement” therefore is equivalent to a voluntary slave plantation.

 
Origin of Settlement (Birth) Certificates

Under King Henry VIII of England and his Venetian/Magyar advisers, the first poor laws were promulgated around 1535 coinciding with the first official mandate requiring uniform record keeping by all Church of England parishes of births, deaths and marriages. The poor were considered the responsibility of the “Church” including ensuring they had ample work and did not starve to death as they were considered by default the property of the church.

Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, a set of measures which were introduced which had the effect of accelerating the disenfranchisement of land peasants into landless paupers. Under the Erection of Cottages Act 1588, peasants required local parish permission to erect dwellings whereas before the erection of a dwelling by a land peasant on their lord’s land was considered a “right”. As a result, the ranks of the landless poor, or “paupers” swelled.

Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, the laws concerning the administration and care of the “poor” were refined through the Poor Law (1601) which introduced a basic set of “rights” for the poor as well as the introduction of two “Overseers of the Poor” (Guardian) in each Parish, elected at Easter and funded through the first levy (tax) through local rates (now called “council taxes”) on property owning rate payers.

Under Charles II of England, the concept of “Settlements” as plantations of working poor controlled by the Church of England was further refined through the Settlement Act (1662) and Poor Relief Act (1662) including for the first time the issuance of “Settlement Certificates” equivalent to a “birth certificate, passport and social security” rolled into one document. A child’s birthplace was its place of settlement, unless its mother had a settlement certificate from some other parish stating that the unborn child was included on the certificate. However from the age of 7 upwards the child could have been apprenticed and gained a settlement for itself through called indentured service, or “voluntary slavery”. Also, the child could have obtained a settlement for itself by service by the time it was 16.

Under the “reforms” of the Settlement Act (1662) and Poor Relief Act (1662), no one was allowed to move from town to town without the appropriate “Settlement Certificate”. If a person entered a parish in which he or she did not have official settlement, and seemed likely to become chargeable to the new parish, then an examination would be made by the justices (or parish overseers). From this examination on oath, the justices would determine if that person had the means to sustain himself. The results of the examination were documented in an Examination Paper. As a result of the examination the intruder would then either be allowed to stay, or would be removed by means of what was known as a Removal Order, the origin of the modern equivalent of an “Eviction and Removal Notice” when a sheriff removes people from their home.

According to the various settlement acts from the 17th Century onwards until the introduction of Birth Certificates, the issue of a Settlement Certificate was considered a privilege, not a right. If a peasant wanted to move, the home parish could choose to issue a Settlement Certificate which then effectively became an indemnity insurance to the new parish if the pauper was unable to earn a living. A settlement certificate was only valid if it bore the seals of the overseers of both parishes and that of the local Justices and was not transferable. This is the same model of modern passports for citizens listed as “P” (Paupers or Peons) used today.

Due to the increase in the number of “poor”, in 1723 a new law was passed called the Workhouse Test Act (1723) in which those who wished to claim benefits and relief as poor now had to enter a “workhouse” being essentially a prison for men, women and children to perform some set work. To ensure that all poor were accounted and could be identified, new laws were also introduced to force the Paupers to wear a ‘P’ on their right shoulders as a mark of their status. This is both the origin of the “P” still placed as a mark on modern passports and other “official” documents and the “P” worn by prisoners from the 20th Century.

Beginning in 1773 with the Inclosure Act 1773, followed by the Inclosure Consolidation Act 1801, English Parliament effectively “privatized” massive amounts of common land for the benefit of a few, causing huge numbers of land peasants to become “landless paupers” and therefore in need of parish assistance. The Inclosure Acts are the foundation of Land Title as it is known today.

Because of the deliberate “legal” theft of land under parliamentary Inclosure laws of the late 18th and early 19th Century, the number of paupers dramatically increased. This led to the most awful and cruel laws being introduced to deliver to an elite few, the slave labor force needed for the industrial revolution through the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) which effectively stated that the poor could not receive any benefit unless they were constantly “employed” in a workhouse prison. Thus, despite international treaties against slavery, the very worst slavery being “wage slavery” or “lawful slavery” was born whereby men, women and children lived in terrible conditions and were worked “to death”.

Beginning in 1834, a number of historic changes were introduced to the record keeping of births, deaths and marriages, the issuance of documents and the management of the “poor”:

(i) In 1834, British Parliament introduced the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) which reorganized Church of England parishes into unions which would then be responsible for the poor in their area and administered by a Board of Poor Law Guardians, also known as the Board of Guardians. The clerks of Magistrates Courts still hold the power of a Clerk of the Board of Guardians; and

(ii) In 1835, the Municipal Corporations Act (1835) was introduced which effectively standardized the corporate model for towns and boroughs including making the municipality with elected officials responsible for data collection and service administration; and

(iii) In 1836, the Births and Deaths Registration Act (1836) was introduced which for the first time created the General Register Office and the requirement for uniform records of births, deaths and marriages across the Empire by Municipal Councils and Unions of Parishes. Thus on 1 July 1837, the Birth Certificate was formed as the successor of the Settlement Certificate for all “paupers” disenfranchised of their land birthright to be considered lawful (“voluntary”) slaves with benefits provided by the local parish/region underwritten by the Society of Lloyds as it is still today.

Beginning from 1871, further historic changes in the administration of “vital statistics” such as birth certificates and death certificates with the introduction of health districts or “sanitary districts”. The Local Government Act of 1871, Public Health Act 1872 and Public Health Act 1875 created a system of “districts” called Sanitary Districts governed by a Sanitary Authority responsible for various public health matters including mental health legally known as “sanity”. Two types of Sanitary Districts were created being Urban and Rural. While the sanitary districts were “abolished” in 1894 with the Local Government Act of 1894, the administration of the “poor” is still maintained in part under the concept of district health boards of Guardians including magistrates and other “Justices of the Peace”.

Since 1990 under the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the system of issuing birth certificates as proof of a man or woman being a permanent member of the underclass has become an international system.

Continue reading at:

Birth Certificate as proof one is born on the land

I received the following email requesting I share with others.  It nice to see these success stories when it comes to cleaning up the fraud on “Banking”.  Congratulations John!

Good day to you Angel;

I am writing you to let you know about my success regarding the use of the OPPT filings you had wrote about in early 2013.

First thank you for DOing and BEing and specifically your DOing regarding your Blog; Streets of Love-unconventional.

I had made a choice once I learned and understood the OPPT filings, to stop paying my mortgage. CHASE subsequently began to do their thing with attempting the collection of the alleged debt, never providing a name to their letters, so I ignored them.

I decided in March of 2013 to send CHASE a note and a copy of the UCC doc no. 2012114586. After that I did not hear from them for 5 months or so, then they began sending me offers to settle, however there was now a name Patrick Boyle whom is a Vice President for CHASE. I ignored those for many months. They hired a collection service, Professional Recovery services, Inc.. I promptly sent John Crosby senior account manager a courtesy notice. They referred the case back to CHASE.

On January 7 2014 I sent Patrick Boyle VP CHASE a courtesy notice, offer to contract, and request for documentation of funding. They acknowledged receiving my “questions regarding your mortgage” in a letter dated January 27 2014.

I had not heard from them until I just received a letter from CHASE dated July 8 2014 stating that they had cancelled my alleged debt in the amount of $49,292.69.

I scanned my documents to a pdf for you to see. Please feel free to share on your blog or elsewhere if you think you would like to.

In Lak Ech
Namaste

Don

The first file in the “Downloads” box at the top left is the file to download:

Don_Schiavone_CHASE_mortgage_release.pdf

Right-Click and select download.

Posted from:
Paradoxman316 YouTube Channel

https://www.youtube.com/user/paradoxman316

Published on Mar 13, 2014

Changing the world is no easy task! Not only have people been programmed in and by the matrix itself, most have not yet developed the ability to think outside the box of familiar definitions. For example, we think the United Nations and New World Order are evil, especially those in the “truth movement” and conspiracy network. Yet, in truth, nations have never been united and there is absolutely nothing new about the world order envisioned by the elite establishment. It is simply a continuation of a control system with better tools to tighten the screws. What if we really could find a way to unite the nations of the world in peace? What if we were actually able to co-create a “new” world order, based not on control by rulers, but based on love by leaders who wanted everyone to prosper and succeed in life? The latter is the goal of most, if not all the SwissIndo delegates.

————-

i-have-a-dream-wordle

Posted from:
Paige Lise YouTube Channel
https://www.youtube.com/user/paigeilise?feature=watch

Published on Mar  9, 2013

The One People’s Public Trust (OPPT) consists of every person on the planet, the planet itself and the Creator.

The One People’s Trust trustees are a group of very skilled individuals including legal professionals who, in conjunction with a positive group inside the financial system, carried out extensive investigations into the massive fraud and theft taking place at the time.

They concluded that the financial and corporate government systems were committing treason against the people and after testing different approaches at correcting the injustices against humanity they saw being inflicted, they decided that that the only solution was to terminate the entire system through UCC filings.

This video contains excerpts (edited to maximize understanding of the purpose by minimizing the “legalese”) from one of those filings, UCC Financing Statement Amendment to UCC Doc #2000043135, which can be read in its entirety here http://oppt-in.com/wp-content/uploads…

Intended for the heart…

For more information, visit http://www.peoplestrust1776.org (official) http://www.oppt-in.com (community) http://americankabuki.blogspot.com (blog)

money-masters

——————-

 

Posted from:

Image

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/l-randall-wray/new-yorks-us-bankruptcy-c_b_824167.html

United States Bankruptcy Judge Robert Grossman has ruled that MERS’s business practices are unlawful. He explicitly acknowledged that this ruling sets a precedent that has far-reaching implications for half of the mortgages in this country. MERS is dead. The banks are in big trouble. And all foreclosures should be stopped immediately while the legislative branch comes up with a solution.

For some weeks I have been arguing that MERS is perpetrating foreclosure fraud all across the nation. Its business model makes it impossible to legally foreclose on any mortgaged property registered within its system — which includes half of the outstanding mortgages in the US. MERS was a fraud from day one, whose purpose was to evade property recording fees and to subvert five centuries of property law. Its chickens have come home to roost.

Wall Street wanted to transform America’s housing sector into the world’s biggest casino and needed to undermine property rights to make it easier to run the scam. The payoffs were bigger for lenders who could induce homeowners to take mortgages they could not possibly afford. The mortgages were packaged into securities sold-on to patsy investors who were defrauded by the “reps and warranties” falsely certifying the securities as backed by top grade loans. In fact the securities were not backed by mortgages, and in any case the mortgages were sure to go bad. Given that homeowners would default, the Wall Street banks that serviced the mortgages needed a foreclosure steamroller to quickly and cheaply throw families out of the homes so that they could be resold to serve as purported collateral for yet more gambling bets. MERS — the industry’s creation — stepped up to the plate to facilitate the fraud. The judge has ruled that its practices are illegal. MERS and the banks lose; investors and homeowners win.

Here’s MERS’s business model in brief. Real estate property sales and mortgages are supposed to be recorded in local recording offices, with fees paid. With the rise of securitization, each mortgage might be sold a dozen times before it came to rest as the collateral behind a mortgage backed security (MBS), and each of those sales would need to be recorded. MERS was created to bypass public recording; it would be listed in the county records as the “mortgagee of record” and the “nominee” of the holder of mortgage. Members of MERS could then transfer the mortgage from one to another without all the trouble of changing the local records, simply by (voluntarily) recording transactions on MERS’s registry.

A mortgage has two parts, the “note” and the “security” (not to be confused with the MBS) or “deed of trust” that is usually just called the “mortgage”. The idea behind MERS was that the “note” would be transferred from seller to purchaser, but the “mortgage” would be held by MERS. In fact, MERS recommended that the “note” be held by the mortgage servicer to facilitate foreclosures, but in practice it seems that the notes were often lost or destroyed (which is why all those Burger King Kids were hired to Robo-sign “lost note affidavits”).

At each transfer, the note and mortgage are supposed to be “assigned” to the new owner; MERS claimed that because it was the “mortgagee of record” and the “nominee” of both parties to every transaction, there was no need to assign the “mortgage” until foreclosure. And it argued that since the old adage is that the “mortgage follows the note” and that both parties intended to assign the notes (even if they did not get around to doing it), then the Bankruptcy Court should rule that the assignments did take place in some sort of “virtual reality” so that there is a clear chain of title that allows the servicers to foreclose.

The Judge rejected every aspect of MERS’s argument. The Court rejected the claim that MERS could be both holder of the mortgage as well as nominee of the “true” owner. It also found that “mortgagee of record” is a vague term that does not give one legal standing as mortgagee. Hence, at best, MERS is only a nominee. It rejected MERS’s claim that as nominee it can assign notes or mortgages — a nominee has limited rights and those most certainly do not include the right to transfer ownership unless there is specific written instruction to do so. In scarcely veiled anger, the Judge wrote:

“According to MERS, the principal/agent relationship among itself and its members is created by the MERS rules of membership and terms and conditions, as well as the Mortgage itself. However, none of the documents expressly creates an agency relationship or even mentions the word “agency.” MERS would have this Court cobble together the documents and draw inferences from the words contained in those documents.”

Judge Grossman rejected MERS’s arguments, saying that mere membership in MERS does not provide “agency” rights to MERS, and agreeing with the Supreme Court of Kansas that ruled “The parties appear to have defined the word [nominee] in much the same way that the blind men of Indian legend described an elephant — their description depended on which part they were touching at any given time.”

He went on to disparage MERS’s claim that since in legal theory the “mortgage follows the note”, the Court should overlook the fact that MERS separated them. He stopped just short of saying that by separating them, MERS has irretrievably destroyed the clear chain of title, although he hinted that a future ruling could come to that conclusion:

“MERS argues that notes and mortgages processed through the MERS System are never “separated” because beneficial ownership of the notes and mortgages are always held by the same entity. The Court will not address that issue in this Decision, but leaves open the issue as to whether mortgages processed through the MERS system are properly perfected and valid liens. See Carpenter v. Longan, 83 U.S. at 274 (finding that an assignment of the mortgage without the note is a nullity); Landmark Nat’l Bank v. Kesler, 216 P.3d 158, 166-67 (Kan. 2009) (“[I]n the event that a mortgage loan somehow separates interests of the note and the deed of trust, with the deed of trust lying with some independent entity, the mortgage may become unenforceable”).”

That would mean not only the end of MERS, but also the end of the banks holding unenforceable mortgages because they were not, and cannot be, “perfected”. MERS and the banks screwed up big time, and there is no “do over” — there is no valid lien on the property, so owners have got their homes free and clear.

There have been numerous court rulings against MERS — including decisions made by state supreme courts. What is significant about the US Bankruptcy Court of New York’s ruling is that the judge specifically set out to examine the legality of MERS’s business model. As the judge argued in the decision, “The Court believes this analysis is necessary for the precedential effect it will have on other cases pending before this Court”. In the scathing opinion, Judge Grossman variously labeled MERS’s positions as “stunningly inconsistent” with the facts, “absurd, at best”, and “not supported by the law”. The ruling is a complete repudiation of every argument MERS has made about the legality of its procedures.

What is particularly ironic is that MERS actually forced the judge to undertake the examination of its business model. The case before the judge involved a foreclosed homeowner who had already lost in state court. The homeowner then approached the US Bankruptcy Court to argue that the foreclosing bank did not have legal standing because of MERS’s business practices. However, by the “Rooker-Feldman” doctrine (or res judicata), the US Bankruptcy Court is prohibited from “looking behind” the state court’s decision to determine the issue of legal standing. Hence, Judge Grossman ruled in the bank’s favor on that particular issue.

Yet, MERS’s high priced lawyers wanted to push the issue and asked for the Judge to rule in favor of MERS’s practices, too. So while MERS won the little battle over one foreclosed home, it lost the war against the nation’s homeowners. The Judge ruled against MERS on every single issue of importance. And it was MERS’s stupid arrogance that brought it down.

As I predicted two weeks ago, MERS would be dead within weeks. Judge Grossman has driven the final stake through its black heart. The half of America’s homeowners whose mortgages are registered at MERS have been handed a “get out of jail free” card. Wall Street has no right to foreclose on their property. The tide has turned. It won’t be easy, but homeowners in those states with judicial foreclosures now have Judge Grossman on their side. Those in the other states (just over half) will have a tougher time because they can lose their home before they ever get to court. But the law is still on their side — foreclosure by members of MERS is theft — so class action lawsuits may be the way to go.

MERS is dead, but can the banks survive? There are two separate issues. First, there are the “reps and warranties” given by the mortgage securitizers (Wall Street investment banks) to the investors (pension funds, GSEs, PIMCO, and so on). We now know that a quarter to a third of the mortgages bundled to serve as backing for the securities did not meet stated quality. Worse, we also know that the banks knew this — they hired third parties to undertake “due diligence” to check quality. This was not done to protect the investors, rather, the purpose was to strengthen the bargaining position of the securitizers, who were able to reduce the prices paid for the mortgages. Now, the investors are suing the banks for restitution–forcing them to cover the losses and buy-back the bad mortgages at original price. To add insult to injury, even the NYFed is suing them. That is a lot like having your parents sue you for their inadequate parental oversight of your behavior.

The second issue is that the mortgages backing the securities were supposed to be placed in Trusts (affiliates of the securitizing banks), with the Trustee certifying not only that the mortgages met the reps and warranties but also that the documents were up to snuff and safely locked away. We know they were not. As mentioned above, MERS told the servicers to hold the notes, and many or most of them were destroyed or lost. Further, the notes were separated from the mortgages — making them null and void. In any case, they are not at the Trusts. This means the MBSs are not backed by mortgages, meaning the MBSs are unsecured debt. MERS’s business model ensures that. So, again, the banks must take back the fraudulent securities — paying off the investors.

What can Wall Street do? Well, I suppose the “help wanted” signs are already up at MERS and Wall Street banks: “Needed: Burger King Kids to Robo-sign forged quasi-professional-looking docs”. The problem is that even with tens of thousands of Robo-Kids, Wall Street will not be able to pull off a vast criminal conspiracy on the necessary scale. Think about it: 60 million mortgages, each sold ten times, means 600 million transactions and assignments that have to be forged. MERS’s documentation was notoriously sloppy, relying on voluntary recording by members. The Robo-Kids would have to go back through a decade of records to manufacture a paper trail that would convince now-skeptical judges that there is a clear chain of title from the first recording in the public record through to the foreclosure. It ain’t going to happen.

The only other hope is that Wall Street can call in its campaign contribution chips and get Congress to retroactively legalize fraud. That is what they do in those dictatorships that protestors are now bringing down in the Middle East. Is Washington willing to take that risk, just to please its Wall Street benefactors?

The court document is available here. It is terrific reading.

This post originally appeared at Benzinga.

——————————————-

Image

Posted from:

Image

HERE ARE TRUTHFUL FACTS MOST PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW, …. BUT SHOULD…
 
  1. The IRS is Not a US government agency.  It is an agency of the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Diversified Metal Products v I.R.S et al.  CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391)
  2. The IMF (International Monetary Fund) is an agency of the U.N. (Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Ed. page 816)
  3. The United States has NOT had a Treasury since 1921 (41 Stat. Ch 214 page 654)
  4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Presidential Documents Volume 24-No. 4 page 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-2887)
  5. The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States! No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of bankruptcy it is finally over. (Executive Order 12803)
  6. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never  part of the U.S. government, even though the “U.S. Government” held stock in the agencies. (U.S. v Strang, 254 US491 Lewis v. US, 680 F.2nd, 1239)
  7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the U.N. through the IMF (International Monetary Fund). The application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 Form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 forms and not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who publishes them while the old form states they are “Department of the Treasury”. (20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111 Subpart B. 422.103 (b))
  8. There are NO Judicial Courts in America and have not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat 138-178)
  9. There have NOT been any judges in America since 1789. There have just been administrators.  (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178)
  10. According to GATT (The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) you MUST have a Social Security number. (House Report (103-826)
  11. New York City is defined in Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Guiliani stated on C-Span that “New York City is the capital of the World.” For once, he told the truth. (20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111, subpart B 44.103 (b) (2) (2) )
  12. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund.  (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619 Steward Co. v. Davis 301 US 548)
  13. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF (International Monetary Fund), which is an agency of the United Nations. (It says “U.S. Department of Treasury” at the top left corner, which again is part of the U.N. as pointed out above)
  14. You own NO property!!! Slaves can’t own property. Read carefully the Deed to the property you think is yours.  You are listed as a TENANT. (Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)
  15. The most powerful court in America is NOT the United States Supreme court, but rather the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 PA. C.S.A. 502)
  16. The King of England financially backed both sides of the American Revolutionary War..   (Treaty of Versailles-July 16, 1782 Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)
  17. You CANNOT use the U.S. Constitution to defend yourself because you are NOT a party to it!  The U.S. Constitution applies to the CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES, a privately owned and operated corporation (headquartered out of Washington, DC) much like IBM (International Business Machines, Microsoft, et al) and NOT to the people of the sovereign Republic of the united States of America.  (Padelford Fay & Co. v The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)
  18. America is a British Colony. The United States is a corporation, not a land mass and it existed before the Revolutionary War and the British Troops did not leave until 1796 (Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774)
  19. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVsMUpPgdT0
  20. Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213)
  21. The Pope can abolish any law in the United States (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1, 53-54)
  22. A 1040 Form is for tribute paid to Britain (IRS Publication 6209)
  23. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery.  (Papal Bulls of 1495 & 1493)
  24. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people.(Papal Bulls of 1455 & 1493)
  25. The Pope’s laws are obligatory on everyone.  (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix, c. vii, n. 4. Prati, 1844 Syllabus Prop 28, 29, 44)
  26. We are slaves and own absolutely nothing, NOT even what we think are our children.  (Tillman vs. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten vs. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 438 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)
  27. Military dictator George Washington divided up the States (Estates) in to Districts  (Messages and papers of the Presidents Volume 1 page 99 1828 Dictionary of Estate)
  28. “The People” does NOT include you and me. (Barron vs. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243)
  29. It is NOT the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect THE CORPORATION and arrest code breakers. (SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, REiff vs. City of Phila. 477 F. 1262, Lynch vs. NC Dept. of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247)
  30. Every thing in the “United States” is up for sale: bridges, roads, water, schools, hospitals, prisons, airports, etc, etc… Did anybody take time to check who bought Klamath Lake?? (Executive Order 12803)
  31. “We are human capital” (Executive Order 13037)  The world cabal makes money off of the use of your signatures on mortgages, car loans, credit cards, your social security number, etc. 
  32. The U.N. – United Nations – has financed the operations of the United States government (the corporation of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) for over 50 years (U.S. Department of Treasury is part of the U.N. see above) and now owns every man, woman and child in America.
    The U.N. also holds all of the land of America in Fee Simple.
    The good news is we don’t have to fulfill “our” fictitious obligations. You can discharge a fictitious obligation with another’s fictitious obligation.

—————————————–

http://stopthepirates.blogspot.nl/2012/07/these-documents-are-not-secret-they-are.html


%d bloggers like this: