US Treasury (Foreclosed Private Corporation) Issues Fraud Alert for Accepted for Value and Promissory Notes – Some One is Lying – Want to guess who? You Decide…

Posted: August 6, 2013 in One People's Public Trust (OPPT)

We have seen the Accepted for Value and Promissory Notes articles that say we can do this.  Personally, based on our research, these instruments can and should be used.  However, this article from our beloved criminal treasury says it is fraud.  More research is needed.  I Am still researching this and will report more on this blog as it is found.

Angel

———————————————————-

Posted from:

US Treasury (foreclosed private corporation)

http://www.treasury.gov/about/organizational-structure/ig/Pages/fraud-alerts_index2.aspx

—————————————–

The U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury), Office of Inspector General, investigates individuals’ use of fraudulent Treasury-related financial obligations or accounts to attempt purchases or pay debts.  Fraud perpetrators across the nation have recently begun to use fraudulent promissory notes and/or private bonds as vehicles to defraud investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars. 

The Department of the Treasury is also aware of several fraudulent schemes that involve what are claimed to be securities issued or backed by the Treasury Department or another part of the U.S. Government.  These scams have been directed towards banks, charities, individuals, and companies which seek payment on the fraudulent securities. Many of the scams originate from persons attempting to avoid paying tax obligations: the Internal Revenue Service provides additional background and information on these scams here.

Another scheme is a variation of a common fraud generally known as “redemption” or “acceptance for value” that incorrectly asserts the United States government has trust accounts linked to each citizen. The theory is not supported in fact or law and has been soundly rejected by the federal courts. Perpetrators will annotate or stamp invoices with “Accept for Value” or similar language, with various numbers purporting to be account numbers. Such annotations are without merit and establish no rights or privileges in any federal or state account or agency.

The annotation, and additional documents seeking to establish some sort of relationship with or claim against the U.S. Government, are worthless and establish no rights or privileges in any account in any federal or state agency. The documents further a fraud commonly known as “redemption”, or “chargeback,” or “acceptance for value” that incorrectly asserts the United States government has trust accounts linked to each citizen, and that individuals can gain control over this account by making particular filings with state and Federal authorities.

Recently, Treasury OIG has become aware of a different variation of this scheme.  Individuals are obtaining routing numbers from Treasury bureaus, specifically the Financial Management Service (FMS) and the Bureau of the Public Debt (BPD), or a Federal Reserve bank, and using these numbers to make the false notes appear genuine.

Further, many of these fraudsters hold seminars throughout the United States, teaching attendees how to create these fictitious documents and how to use federal routing numbers.  Individuals are now creating false checking accounts with the federal routing numbers, using their social security number as the checking account number, and listing the bank as either the FMS or the BPD.  Be advised that Treasury bureaus and the Treasury Direct Program do NOT offer checking accounts for the public,  and they will NOT honor any of these checks. Participating in these scams can result in serious criminal and civil penalties.

It is also a violation of Federal Law to misuse the Treasury seal or the words, titles, symbols, or emblems of the Treasury Department, or any service, bureau, office or Treasury subdivision; see 31 U.S.C. 333.

Click the links below for specific information on sample fraudulent schemes and documents that falsely use name of Treasury bureaus and/or officials. These and similar documents are NOT valid negotiable financial instruments and recipients should NOT accept them or attempt to use them.

Continue reading on this site for examples of these documents. 

And remember, they’ve (our government) has been lying about everything.  What makes you think that this is any different!  Utilities are already paid too!

 

Advertisements
Comments
  1. terionmiller says:

    I think this should be the sounding call for more people everywhere to start using A4V.
    IF WE ALL ARE DOING IT WHAT CAN THEY DO

  2. Andy Fife says:

    I just started and I ain’t stopping. If a claim against “me” cannot be set-off through A4V, then the claim fails to provide the mandatory remedy. Remember: FTSAC, failure to state a claim upon which relief CAN BE GRANTED. Making remedy impossible is unlawful. They MUST accept the a4v.

  3. Andy Fife says:

    Dunno’ bout trust accounts, but I do have bonds . HJR 192 is “forgotten” by the IRS in their ramblings and misdirections.

  4. Andy Fife says:

    The Cesta que trust isn’t plural. Courts raid it everytime “you” are forced into their make believe courts

  5. Andy Fife says:

    Ask the ‘Judge’ or IRS , or TAXMAN, if he can authorize you to pay the “debt” with anything other than gold or silver coin???? YEE HAWWWWWWW

  6. Vladimir C says:

    I’d be more than happy to file and teach people how to file if I was able to tell which method actually works!

  7. LUCY FER says:

    A4V is BULLSHIT……………………..It should work in THEORY, but NJ courts DO NOT uphold the AMERICAN CONSTITUTION!!! They couldn’t care less about who is “RIGHT” and who is “WRONG”. It’s all about the money………………………….you either pay cash, or you go to JAIL!!!

  8. dotnetspec says:

    Reblogged this on LibertyBank and commented:
    Should we believe the US Treasury or make up our own minds based on our own research?

  9. nabarexist says:

    Check the words they use they are careful to say what and how people are using it. They didn’t say anything about the red letter and numbers on the back. About the BC bond or anything relevant, just smoke and mirror talk. Peep into before you post this b.s.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s